Author:
Courcol R J,Fruchart A,Roussel-Delvallez M,Martin G R
Abstract
The present study compares the sensitivity, accuracy, and practicability of a nonradiometric blood culture system with those of the standard blood culture system in use in our laboratory. A total of 1,080 sets of four blood cultures bottles were compared, giving 143 positive aerobic-medium associations and 139 positive anaerobic-medium associations. The conventional system recovered 171 isolates, whereas the BACTEC NR 660 system (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, Md.) recovered 155 isolated. There were no significant differences in total isolates with either system (P more than 0.05). The BACTEC NR 660 system recovered a slightly lower number of Serratia marcescens and Streptococcus faecalis but a higher number of Pneumococcus spp. The mean detection times were 55.9 h with the conventional system and 31.6 h with the BACTEC NR 660 system (P less than 0.001). Our results demonstrate that the BACTEC NR 660 system is suitable for routine use.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference11 articles.
1. Radiometric detection of bacteremia in neonates. Apple;Bannatyne R. M.;Microbiol.,1974
2. Bartlett R. C. P. D. Ellner and J. A. Washington Il. 1974. Cumitech 1 Blood cultures. Coordinating ed. J. C. Sherris. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
3. Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia;Finegold S. M.;Appl. Microbiol.,1969
4. Blood culture cross contamination associated with a radiometric analyzer;Griffin M. R.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1982
5. The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia;Ilstrup D. M.;Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.,1983
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献