Rapid Diagnostic Method for Detection of Mumps Virus Genome by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification
-
Published:2005-04
Issue:4
Volume:43
Page:1625-1631
-
ISSN:0095-1137
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Microbiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Clin Microbiol
Author:
Okafuji Takao12, Yoshida Naoko2, Fujino Motoko2, Motegi Yoshie2, Ihara Toshiaki3, Ota Yoshinori4, Notomi Tsugunori4, Nakayama Tetsuo2
Affiliation:
1. Okafuji Pediatric Clinic, Himeji, Hyougo 2. Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences, Laboratory of Viral Infection I, Minato-ku 3. Department of Pediatrics, Mie National Hospital, Tsu, Mie, Japan 4. Eiken Chemical Co. Ltd., Kita-ku, Tokyo
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Most mumps patients are clinically diagnosed without any virological examinations, but some diagnosed cases of mumps may be caused by other pathogens or secondary vaccine failure (SVF). To clarify these issues, a sensitive, specific, and rapid diagnostic method is required. We obtained 60 salivary swabs from 34 patients with natural infection during the course of the illness, 10 samples from patients with vaccine-associated parotitis, and 5 samples from patients with SVF. Total RNA was extracted and subjected to reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for genome amplification. We detected mumps virus RNA corresponding to 0.1 PFU by LAMP within 60 min after RNA extraction, with the same sensitivity as RT-nested PCR. Mumps virus was isolated in 30 of 33 samples within day 2, and mumps virus genome was amplified by LAMP in 32 of them. The quantity of virus titer was calculated by monitoring the time to reach the threshold of turbidity. The viral load decreased after day 3 and was lower in patients serologically diagnosed as having SVF with milder illness. Accuracy of LAMP for the detection of mumps virus genome was confirmed; furthermore, it is of benefit for calculating the viral load, which reflects disease pathogenesis.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Microbiology (medical)
Reference28 articles.
1. Carbone, K. M., and J. S. Wolinsky. 2001. Mumps virus, p. 1381-1400. In D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, D. E. Griffin, R. A. Lamb, M. A. Martin, B. Roizman, and S. E. Straus (ed.), Fields Virology, 4th ed., vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1998. Measles, mumps, rubella—vaccine use and strategies for elimination of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome and control of mumps: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.47(RR-8):1-57. 3. Gueudin, M., A. Vabret, J. Petitjean, S. Gouarin, J. Brouard, and F. Freymuth. 2003. Quantitation of respiratory syncytial virus RNA in nasal aspirates of children by real-time RT-PCR assay. J. Virol. Methods109:39-45. 4. Rapid Diagnosis of Human Herpesvirus 6 Infection by a Novel DNA Amplification Method, Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification 5. Inou, Y., T. Nakayama, N. Yoshida, H. Uejima, K. Yuri, M. Kamada, T. Kumagai, H. Sakiyama, A. Miyata, H. Ochiai, T. Ihara, T. Okafuji, T. Okafuji, T. Nagai, E. Sizuki, K. Shimomura, Y. Ito, and C. Miyazaki. 2004. Molecular epidemiology of mumps virus in Japan and proposal of two new genotypes. J. Med. Virol.73:97-104.
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|