Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Linezolid: a Retrospective Monocentric Analysis

Author:

Pea Federico1,Furlanut Mario1,Cojutti Piergiorgio1,Cristini Francesco2,Zamparini Eleonora2,Franceschi Loretta1,Viale Pierluigi3

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Santa Maria Misericordia, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pathology and Medicine, Medical School, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

2. Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical and Morphological Research, Medical School, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

3. Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Nephrologic Diseases, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of the present retrospective observational study carried out in patients receiving a standard dosage of linezolid and undergoing routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was to assess the interindividual variability in plasma exposure, to identify the prevalence of attainment of optimal pharmacodynamics, and to define if an intensive program of TDM may be warranted in some categories of patients. Linezolid plasma concentrations (trough [ C min ] and peak [ C max ] levels) were analyzed by means of a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and daily drug exposure was estimated (daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC 24 ]). The final database included 280 C min and 223 C max measurements performed in 92 patients who were treated with the fixed 600-mg dose every 12 h (q12h) intravenously ( n = 58) or orally ( n = 34). A wide variability was observed (median values [interquartile range]: 3.80 mg/liter [1.75 to 7.53 mg/liter] for C min , 14.70 mg/liter [10.57 to 19.64] for C max , and 196.08 mg·h/liter [144.02 to 312.10 mg·h/liter] for estimated AUC 24 ). Linezolid C min was linearly correlated with estimated AUC 24 ( r 2 = 0.85). Optimal pharmacodynamic target attainment (defined as C min of ≥2 mg/liter and/or AUC 24 /MIC 90 ratio of >80) was obtained in about 60 to 70% of cases, but potential overexposure (defined as C min of ≥10 mg/liter and/or AUC 24 of ≥400 mg·h/liter) was documented in about 12% of cases. A significantly higher proportion of cases with potential overexposure received cotreatment with omeprazole, amiodarone, or amlodipine. Our study suggests that the application of TDM might be especially worthwhile in about 30% of cases with the intent of avoiding either the risk of dose-dependent toxicity or that of treatment failure.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Cited by 172 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3