Author:
Stamm W E,Tam M,Koester M,Cles L
Abstract
We compared two methods for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy cell monolayers: conventional iodine staining and immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies against the species-specific major outer membrane protein antigen of C. trachomatis. Among 878 urethral and cervical specimens tested in parallel, the immunofluorescence method detected eightfold more inclusions per monolayer, identified a higher proportion of positive specimens on first passage (98 versus 62% by iodine staining; P less than 0.01), and improved overall sensitivity (98% of total positive specimens detected versus 84% by iodine staining; P less than 0.01). Improved sensitivity was most evident in specimens with low numbers of inclusions. Compared with conventional iodine staining, immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies improves sensitivity and offers more rapid detection of chlamydial inclusions in cell culture.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference10 articles.
1. Darougar S. R. M. Woodland T. Forsey S. Cubitt J. Allami and B. R. Jones. 1977. Isolation of Chlamvdia from ocular infections p. 295-298. In D. Hobson and K. K. Holmes (ed.) Nongonococcal urethritis and related infections. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
2. Public Health implications of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis;Handsfield H. H.;Sex. Transm. Dis.,1981
3. The chiamydia epidemic;Holmes K. K.;J. Am. Med. Assoc.,1981
4. Cultural method for large scale screening for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection;Mallinson H.;J. Clin. Pathol.,1981
5. Failure of serology in diagnosing chlamydial infections of the female genital tract;Schachter J.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1979
Cited by
212 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献