Efficiency of Salmonella Isolation from Meat-and-Bone Meal of One 300-g Sample Versus Ten 30-g Samples

Author:

Huhtanen C. N.1,Naghski J.1,Dellamonica E. S.1

Affiliation:

1. Eastern Regional Research Laboratory, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19118

Abstract

Twenty-five meat-and-bone meal samples were analyzed for salmonellae, comparing a single 300-g to ten 30-g samples. Seventeen were positive using the larger sample; eighteen were positive with the smaller. The 300-g sample showed a significantly higher ( P < 0.01) percentage of confirmed salmonellae at 2 days of incubation than at 1 day. The ten 30-g samples did not show changes at 2 days. At 2 days, the 30-g samples showed significantly fewer confirmed salmonellae than the 300-g sample; however, there was no difference at 1 day. Of 1,417 presumptive colonies picked, 1,215 (85.7%) were lysine decarboxylase-positive and 1,152 (81.3%) were agglutinated by one of the somatic antisera. There were no significant differences in diversity or total numbers of different somatic groups between the large and small samples.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. American Public Health Association. 1958. Recommended methods for the microbiological examination of foods. New York.

2. Erdmann A. A. 1968. Report of the Committee on Salmonellosis p. 139-143. In Proceedings 72nd Annual Meeting of the United States Animal Health Association.

3. Galton M. M. G. K. Morris and W. T. Martin. 1968. Salmonellae in foods and feeds. Review of isolation methods and recommended procedures. National Communicable Disease Center Atlanta Ga.

4. National Academy of Sciences Food Protection Committee. Referencesethods for the microbiological examination of foods. Washington D.C.

5. National Research Council Committee on Salmonella. 1969. An evaluation of the salmonella problem. National Academy of Sciences Washington D.C.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3