Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative PCR Assays for Cytomegalovirus DNA in Plasma

Author:

Caliendo Angela M.1,Schuurman Rob2,Yen-Lieberman Belinda3,Spector Stephen A.4,Andersen Janet5,Manjiry R.2,Crumpacker Clyde6,Lurain Nell S.7,Erice Alejo8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia1;

2. Department of Virology, Eykman Winkler Institute for Clinical Microbiology, Utrecht University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands2;

3. Department of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio3;

4. Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California4;

5. Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Statistics and Data Analysis Center, Harvard School of Public Health,5 and

6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School,6 Boston, Massachusetts;

7. Department of Immunology/Microbiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois7; and

8. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota8

Abstract

ABSTRACT We analyzed the performance characteristics of the qualitative AMPLICOR CMV Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.) and quantitative COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test (Roche Molecular Systems) assays and compared the performance of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay with an in-house-developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA PCR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay was found to be more sensitive than the qualitative AMPLICOR assay. The quantitative AMPLICOR assay has a lower limit of sensitivity of 400 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma and is linear to 50,000 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. Compared to the in-house PCR assay, the AMPLICOR quantitative assay gave lower viral load values at all concentrations tested, but the difference between the two assays was not consistent across the entire dynamic range of the AMPLICOR quantitative assay. At the lower end of the assay, the viral load values obtained with the in-house PCR assay were three- to fivefold (0.5 to 0.7 log units) higher than those measured with the AMPLICOR assay. At higher input concentrations, the differences between the two assays approached 10-fold. This direct comparison of the in-house assay and the quantitative AMPLICOR assay provides the ability to compare previously published in-house data with an assay widely available for future research and clinical monitoring of patients with CMV infections.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3