Affiliation:
1. R.M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica, California
Abstract
ABSTRACT
By using an agar dilution method, the in vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, and five other agents were determined against 300 gram-positive and 54 gram-negative strains of intestinal anaerobes. Ramoplanin was active at ≤2 μg/ml against 287 of 300 (95.7%) gram-positive organisms, including 18 strains of
Clostridium difficile
for which MICs of ramoplanin were 0.25 to 0.5 μg/ml; for 3 of these, linezolid MICs were 8 to 16 μg/ml. Nineteen
Clostridium innocuum
strains for which the vancomycin MIC at which 90% of strains were inhibited was 16 μg/ml were susceptible to ramoplanin at 0.06 to 0.25 μg/ml and to teicoplanin at 0.125 to 1.0 μg/ml. All strains of
Eubacterium
,
Actinomyces
,
Propionibacterium
, and
Peptostreptococcus
spp. were inhibited by ≤0.25 μg of ramoplanin per ml and ≤1 μg of vancomycin per ml. Ramoplanin was also active at ≤4 μg/ml against 15 of 22 of the
Prevotella
and
Porphyromonas
strains tested, but ramoplanin MICs for all 31 strains of the
Bacteroides fragilis
group, the
Fusobacterium mortiferum-Fusobacterium varium
group, and
Veillonella
spp. were ≥256 μg/ml. Ramoplanin displays excellent activity against
C. difficile
and other gram-positive enteric anaerobes, including vancomycin-resistant strains; however, it has poor activity against most gram-negative anaerobes and thus potentially has a lesser effect on the ecological balance of normal fecal flora.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Cited by
82 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献