Comparison of Molecular Typing Methods for Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis : Proposal for Clone Definition

Author:

Miragaia M.1,Carriço J. A.2,Thomas J. C.3,Couto I.45,Enright M. C.3,de Lencastre H.16

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Quinta Grande, nr. 6, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal

2. Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics Group, Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento, Rua Alves Redol nr. 9, Apartado 13069, 1000-029 Lisboa, Portugal

3. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Old Medical School Building, St Mary's Hospital, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom

4. UEI Micobactérias, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira, nr. 96, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal

5. Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal

6. Laboratory of Microbiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the present study we give some direction on the selection of the most appropriate typing method(s) to be used for the characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis , in view of the most recent findings on the evolution, population structure, and epidemiology of this species. In order to achieve this aim, quantitative assessment of the correlation of the results of three typing methods—pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCC mec ) typing, which target different regions of the chromosome that evolve at different rates—was performed. In order to evaluate the discriminatory ability and the strength and direction of the correlation of the different typing methods, Simpson's index of diversity (SID), the adjusted Rand coefficient (AR), and the Wallace coefficient ( W ) were calculated. PFGE was the most discriminatory method (SID = 99%), followed by MLST (SID = 90%) and SCC mec typing (SID = 75%). The values of AR and W (0.10 < AR < 0.30; 0.50 < W < 0.75) indicated that the partition of the same isolate collection by PFGE, MLST, and SCC mec typing provided results that had only a poor correlation with each other. However, the information provided by the combination of PFGE and SCC mec enabled the prediction of the results obtained by MLST at the level of the clonal complex with a high degree of precision ( W > 0.90). We propose that clones of S. epidermidis be defined by the combination of the PFGE type followed by the SCC mec type, which provides reliable information on the short-term epidemiology and the ability to predict with consistency long-term clonal evolution.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3