Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Connecticut 06102-5037.
Abstract
A comparative evaluation of the Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system (Crystal; Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.), API 20E (API; bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), and the Vitek GNI card (Vitek; bioMérieux Vitek) was performed with 512 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli, including 381 members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and 131 nonenteric bacilli. With supplemental testing, API, Crystal, and Vitek correctly identified to the genus and species level 505 (98.6%), 489 (95.5%), and 494 (96.5%) of the 512 isolates, respectively. Supplemental testing, as specified by the manufacturer, was required to identify 119 (23.2%), 18 (3.5%), and 5 (1.0%) of the isolates with the three systems, respectively. Of the 381 isolates from the family Enterobacteriaceae, API and Crystal correctly identified 90.3 and 91.6% by 18 to 24 h without supplemental testing, respectively, and Vitek identified 92.4 and 96.1% following 10 and 18 h of incubation, respectively. Of the 131 nonenteric organisms, API and Crystal correctly identified 28.2 and 93.9% by 18 to 24 h without supplemental testing, respectively, and Vitek identified 84.0% by 10 h and 93.9% by 18 h. Errors in identification with each system were infrequent and appeared to be randomly distributed among the genera evaluated. The three systems were comparable in accuracy when either a weighted clinical laboratory profile of organisms or a group of selected isolates in a stress test sample was evaluated (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the three systems in their ability to identify either the isolates in the weighted group or those in the stress test (P > 0.05). Crystal compared favorably with API and Vitek, which have established track records in clinical laboratories, and is acceptable for the identification of members of the Enterobacteriaceae and nonenteric bacilli in a clinical microbiology laboratory.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference24 articles.
1. Correlation studies of Entero-Set 20, API 20E, and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification;Aldridge K. E.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1981
2. Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli;Costigan W. J.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1984
3. D'Amato R. F. E. J. Bottone and D. Amsterdam. 1991. Substrate profile systems for the identification of bacteria and yeasts by rapid and automated approaches p. 128-136. In A. Balows W. J. Hausler Jr. K. L. Herrmann H. D. Isenberg and H. J. Shadomy (ed.) Manual of clinical microbiology 5th ed. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
4. Ewing W. H. 1986. Edward's and Ewing's identification of Enterobacteriaceae 4th ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc. New York.
5. Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gramnegative bacteria;Holmes B.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1994
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献