Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia

Author:

Jorgensen J H1,Mirrett S1,McDonald L C1,Murray P R1,Weinstein M P1,Fune J1,Trippy C W1,Masterson M1,Reller L B1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7750, USA.

Abstract

Blood specimens collected from adult patients with suspected sepsis in four medical centers were inoculated into BACTEC Plus/F and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic culture bottles. Both bottles of 7,401 bottle pairs contained the prescribed blood volume of 8 to 12 ml. Bottles were incubated in their respective instruments for a standard 7-day protocol or until the instruments signaled that they were positive. A total of 720 isolates that were judged to represent true infections were recovered from 338 patients; 451 isolates were recovered from both bottles, 143 were recovered from only the Plus/F bottle, and 126 were recovered from only the FAN bottle (P was not significant). Although more Histoplasma capsulatum isolates were recovered from Plus/F bottles (P < 0.005), there were no other statistically significant differences in recovery rates of individual species or groups of organisms between the two systems. Of 329 monomicrobic patient septic episodes, 244 episodes were detected by both blood culture systems, 40 were detected only by the BACTEC system, and 45 were detected only by the BacT/Alert system (P was not significant). There was no significant difference between the two systems in the detection of septic episodes among patients receiving antibiotic therapy at the time of blood cultures. Of the cultures found to be positive within the first 72 h of incubation, detection was on average earlier by the BACTEC system (16.9 h) than by the BacT/Alert system (18.7 h). Larger differences in average time to detection were seen with streptococci (10.7 h by the BACTEC system and 17.9 h by the BacT/Alert system) and yeasts (an average of 29.4 h by the BacT/Alert system versus 37.2 h by the BACTEC system). With the exception of the differences noted above, BACTEC Plus/F aerobic resin and BacT/Alert aerobic FAN blood culture bottles were comparable in their abilities to recover aerobic and facultative organisms.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Reference20 articles.

1. Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium;Appelbaum P. C.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1983

2. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the Antimicrobial Removal Device and 16B medium;Doern G. V.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1983

3. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988;Garner J. S.;Am. J. Infect. Control,1988

4. Routine use of BACTEC 16B bottles to remove antibacterial and antitumor agents from blood cultures of cancer patients;Hopfer R. L.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1983

5. Jungkind D. L. M. Thakur and J. Dyke. 1989. Evidence for a second mechanism of action of resin in Bactec NR 16A aerobic blood culture medium abstr. C-225 p. 430. In Abstracts of the 89th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1989. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3