Author:
Masaoka T,Kubota Y,Namiuchi S,Takubo T,Ueda T,Shibata H,Nakamura H,Yoshitake J,Yamayoshi T,Doi H,Kamiki T
Abstract
To establish a convenient method for decontaminating bioclean rooms, the effect of ozone at 80 mg/m3 for 72 h was compared with formaldehyde vaporization at an initial concentration of 150 mg/m3 with a gradual decrease to 20 mg/m3 during 72 h. Ozone was found to be inferior to formaldehyde in activity. When the bioclean room was decontaminated twice with ozone, the mean colony count per 10 cm2 was decreased to about the same level as when formaldehyde was used. Ozone had a strong caustic effect upon rubber materials. Despite these disadvantages, ozone decontamination was demonstrated to be superior to formaldehyde vaporization because of convenience, insignificant inhalation of the disinfectant by the hospital staff, and very rapid expulsion of the gas after ventilation. Because the disadvantages of ozone can be easily controlled, this study suggests that ozone decontamination is a promising method for maintaining bioclean rooms.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference9 articles.
1. Microbiological studies of a laminar air flow unit for patients;Bodey G. P.;Arch. Environ. Health,1969
2. Adsorption of formaldehyde by various surfaces during gaseous decontamination;Brasweil J. R.;AppI. Microbiol.,1970
3. An investigation of the merits of ozone as an aerial disinfectant;Elford W. J.;J. Hyg.,1942
4. Friedlander S. K. (chairman) Committee on Medical and Bidogic Effects of Environmental Pollutants. 1977. Ozone and other photochemical oxidants p. 545-547. National Academy of Sciences Washington D.C.
5. Ozone sterilization technique of hydrophilic contact lenses;Kamiki T.;Contacto Int. Contact Lenses J.,1976
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献