Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
2. Western Cape Department of Agriculture, Directorate Animal Sciences, Elsenburg, South Africa
3. Department of Animal Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
Abstract
The microbial communities of animals can have large impacts on their hosts, and the number of studies using high-throughput sequencing to measure gut microbiomes is rapidly increasing. However, the library preparation procedure in microbiome research is both costly and time-consuming, especially for large numbers of samples. We investigated a cheaper and faster direct PCR method designed to bypass the DNA isolation steps during 16S rRNA library preparation and compared it with a standard DNA extraction method. We used both techniques on five different gut sample types collected from 20 juvenile ostriches and sequenced samples with Illumina MiSeq. The methods were highly comparable and highly repeatable in three sample types with high microbial biomass (cecum, colon, and feces), but larger differences and low repeatability were found in the microbiomes obtained from the ileum and cloaca. These results will help microbiome researchers assess library preparation procedures and plan their studies accordingly.
Funder
The Längmanska Cultural Foundation
The Lund Animal Protection Foundation
The Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation
The Royal Physiographic Society of Lund
The Wallenberg Foundation
The Swedish Research Council
The Western Cape Government
Helge Ax:son Johnsons Stiftelse
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Modelling and Simulation,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Biochemistry,Physiology,Microbiology
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献