Antimicrobial resistance in human oral and intestinal anaerobic microfloras

Author:

Stark C A1,Edlund C1,Sjöstedt S1,Kristensen G1,Nord C E1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

In the present study we determined the resistance patterns of anaerobic bacteria from human saliva and stool specimens and investigated whether there were significant differences in resistance between outpatients and hospitalized patients, regardless of whether they had received antimicrobial agents. No bacterial strains resistant to ampicillin, piperacillin, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, imipenem, clindamycin, doxycycline, chloramphenicol, or metronidazole were isolated from the saliva samples. However, resistance to ampicillin, cefoxitin, and cefuroxime was found in strains from 70% of the fecal samples (mainly Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Clostridium innocuum, and Bacteroides ovatus). Resistance to both ampicillin and cefuroxime was frequently found in 19% of the isolated strains (mainly B. thetaiotaomicron, B. ovatus, and Bacteroides vulgatus). No strains that were resistant to imipenem, chloramphenicol, or metronidazole were found. Hospitalization and/or intake of antimicrobial agents was associated with an increase in the relative number of resistant anaerobic intestinal bacteria. The percentage of resistant anaerobic strains encountered, compared with the total number of anaerobic bacteria in the normal fecal microflora, was between 5.2 and 14.8%, with the lower value associated with the outpatient group. Two-thirds of the resistant strains from this group had a relative frequency of less than 1% of the total anaerobic flora, while one-third of the strains were present at a level of greater than 1%; for the hospitalized patients, two-thirds of the strains were present at a level of greater than 1%, and one-third of the strains were present at a level of less than 1% (P < 0.001). Patients who had received antimicrobial agents for 6 days or more (n=20) had an average of 1.6 resistant anaerobic strains each, while patients treated for 3 to 5 days (n = 30) had a mean number of 0.87 resistant strains each ( P < 0.05).

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference21 articles.

1. Antibiotic consumption and faecal bacterial susceptibility in surgical inpatients;Andaker L.;Acta Chir. Scand.,1987

2. Survey of Bacteroides fragilis group susceptibility patterns in Canada;Bourgault A.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1992

3. Anaerobic bacterial bacteremia: 12-year experience in two military hospitals;Brook I.;J. Infect. Dis.,1989

4. Antimicrobial resistance in oral and colonic bacteroides;Crook D. W.;Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl.,1988

5. -lactamase-mediated imipenem resistance in Bacteroides fragilis;Cuchural G. J.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1986

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Anaerobic Bacteria;Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases;2023

2. Puerperal Sepsis Caused by Clostridium Innocuum in a Patient with Placenta Accreta and Literature Review;Maternal-Fetal Medicine;2020-01-14

3. Antimicrobial Resistance inClostridiumandBrachyspiraspp. and other Anaerobes;Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin;2019-10-25

4. Anaerobic Bacteria;Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases;2018

5. Human microbiota in aging and infection: A review;Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition;2017-10-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3