Comparison of antibody, antigen, and metabolite assays in rat models of systemic and gastrointestinal candidiasis

Author:

Greenfield R A1,Troutt D L1,Rickard R C1,Altmiller D H1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Oklahoma City Veterans Administration Medical Center, Oklahoma City.

Abstract

We compared serial measurements of antibodies to mannan and to a cytoplasmic antigen (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays), detection of mannan and an unidentified candidal antigen (latex agglutination), and assays of mannose and arabinitol (gas chromatographic assay of per-O-acetylated aldonitrile derivatives). In a high-inoculum intravascular-infection model, antimannan assays were consistently positive beginning on day 2 postinoculation, anti-cytoplasmic antigen assays followed the same time course but were less sensitive, mannan was detected in all samples beginning on day 2 postinoculation, and serum mannose concentrations peaked on day 3 postinoculation and were less sensitive than mannan detection. Other assays were not useful. In a lower-inoculum intravascular-infection model, the antibody assays became positive after a similar interval and remained positive for 28 days, with antimannan again being the more sensitive. Mannan and mannose tests were positive in week 1 postinoculation only, with mannan detection being the more sensitive. In a gastrointestinal-colonization model, antimannan assays become positive after 2 weeks of colonization, whereas anti-cytoplasmic antigen and mannan tests remained negative. In a model of gastrointestinal colonization followed by invasive infection produced by induction of neutropenia, only mannan detection was diagnostically useful. These data, comparing this panel of modern serodiagnostic techniques in controlled models of clinically relevant syndromes of candidiasis, enhance understanding of previous efforts in serodiagnosis of candidiasis and provide a foundation for further prospective studies in patients.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3