Comparative efficacy of vancomycin in treating ST5 and ST764 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adult patients

Author:

Fan Yaxin123ORCID,Zhang Kaiting123,Chen Mengting123,Li Nanyang4,Liu Xiaofen123ORCID,Yang Minjie123,Liang Xiaoyu123,Wu Jufang1234,Guo Beining123,Zheng Huajun5,Zhu Yongqiang5,Zhang Fengying6,Hang Jingqing6,Zhang Huifang7,Wang Ruilan7,Yuan Qing8,Song Xiaolian8,Wu Shengbin9,Shen Bo9,Zhang Jing123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

2. Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Population and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China

3. National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

4. Phase I Clinical Research Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

5. Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai and Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, Shanghai, China

6. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Putuo District People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China

7. Emergency and Critical Care Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

8. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China

9. Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study compared the impact of sequence type 5 (ST5) and ST764, on the efficacy of vancomycin treatment in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. From July 2012 to June 2020, a prospective observational study was conducted in five hospitals in China, enrolling 90 patients with MRSA infections, including 44 patients with ST5-MRSA and 46 patients with ST764-MRSA infections. All strains were subjected to minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination, biofilm expression, heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) screening, and whole-genome sequencing. Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring was conducted, and the 24-hour area under the curve (AUC 0-24 ) and AUC 0-24 /MIC values were calculated. ST5-MRSA shows elevated hVISA/VISA presence, increased biofilm formation, and higher presence of virulence genes like tst , sec , and sel . ST764-MRSA expresses seb , aiding infection in elderly patients in the community. Additionally, patients with ST764 infections exhibit higher vancomycin AUC 0-24 /MIC values, and fewer tracheotomies compared to ST5. Clinical signs and symptoms improvement were observed in 27 (61.4%) and 33 (71.7%) patients in the ST5 and ST764 groups, respectively ( P = 0.372). On the other hand, 28 (63.6%) and 39 (84.8%) patients had laboratory-confirmed bacterial eradication in two groups, respectively ( P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis showed that the virulence genes, such as the tst gene, were a risk factor for bacterial persistence (adjusted odds ratio, 4.509; 95% confidence interval, 1.216 to 16.724; P = 0.024). Our study showed that vancomycin was less effective in treating ST5-MRSA infection compared to ST764-MRSA infection, in part because ST5-MRSA is healthcare-associated MRSA while ST764-MRSA carries genetic characteristics of community-associated MRSA. IMPORTANCE Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a bacterium that is resistant to multiple drugs and can cause serious infections. In recent years, one of the most widespread strains of MRSA worldwide has been the clonal complex 5 (CC5) type. Sequence type 5 (ST5) and ST764 are two prevalent CC5 strains. Although ST5 and ST764 are genotypically identical, ST764 is classified as a hybrid variant of ST5 with characteristics of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA). In contrast to ST5, ST764 lacks the tst and sec genes but carries the staphylococcal enterotoxin B ( seb ) gene. Vancomycin is commonly used as the first-line treatment for MRSA infections. However, it is currently unclear whether the genetic differences between the ST5 and ST764 strains have any impact on the efficacy of vancomycin in treating MRSA infections. We conducted a prospective observational study comparing the efficacy of vancomycin against ST5-MRSA and ST764-MRSA in five hospitals in China. There were significant differences in bacteriological efficacy between the two groups, with virulence genes, such as the tst gene, being a risk factor for bacterial persistence (adjusted odds ratio, 4.509; 95% confidence interval, 1.216 to 16.724; P = 0.024). In the future, it may be necessary to consider personalized vancomycin treatment strategies based on the genetic characteristics of MRSA isolates.

Funder

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China

Research Startup Fund of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

Municipal Hospital Emerging Frontier Technology Joint Research Project of Shanghai Shenkang Development Center

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Molecular Biology,Microbiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3