A US-based national surveillance study for the susceptibility and epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile isolates with special reference to ridinilazole: 2020–2021

Author:

Snydman D. R.12ORCID,McDermott L. A.12ORCID,Thorpe C. M.12,Goldstein E. J. C.3,Schuetz A. N.4,Johnson S.56,Gerding D. N.5,Gluck L.7,Bourdas D.7,Carroll K. C.8,Lancaster C. K.9,Garey K. W.9,Wang Q.10,Walk S. T.10,Duperchy E.11

Affiliation:

1. Tufts Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2. Tufts University School of Medicine and the Stuart B. Levy Center for the Integrated Management of Antimicrobial Resistance , Boston, Massachusetts, USA

3. Kindred Health Care System , Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA

4. Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science , Rochester, Minnesota, USA

5. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital , Hines, Illinois, USA

6. Loyola University Medical Center , Maywood, Illinois, USA

7. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA

8. University of Houston College of Pharmacy , Houston, Texas, USA

9. Summit (Oxford) Ltd , Abingdon, United Kingdom

10. Montana State University , Bozeman, Montana, USA

11. Johns Hopkins Hospital , Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT We have previously reported on the susceptibility and epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile isolates from six geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States. This current survey was conducted with isolates collected in 2020–2021 from six geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States, with specific attention to susceptibility to ridinilazole as well as nine comparators. C. difficile isolates or stools from patients with C. difficile antibiotic-associated diarrhea were collected and referred to a central laboratory. After species confirmation of 300 isolates at the central laboratory, antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by the agar dilution method [M11-A9, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)] against the 10 agents. Ribotyping was performed by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis on all isolates. Ridinilazole had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 90 of 0.25 mcg/mL, and no isolate had an MIC greater than 0.5 mcg/mL. In comparison, fidaxomicin had an MIC 90 of 0.5 mcg/mL. The vancomycin MIC 90 was 2 mcg/mL with a 0.7% resistance rate [both CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria]. The metronidazole MIC 90 was 1 mcg/mL, with none resistant by CLSI criteria, and a 0.3% resistance rate by EUCAST criteria. Among the 50 different ribotypes isolated in the survey, the most common ribotype was 014–020 (14.0%) followed by 106 (10.3%), 027 (10%), 002 (8%), and 078–126 (4.3%). Ridinilazole maintained activity against all ribotypes and all strains resistant to any other agent tested. Ridinilazole showed excellent in vitro activity against C. difficile isolates collected between 2020 and 2021 in the United States, independent of ribotype.

Funder

Summit Therapeutics, LLC

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference30 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3