Randomized Controlled Trial of Sequential Intravenous (i.v.) and Oral Moxifloxacin Compared with Sequential i.v. and Oral Co-Amoxiclav with or without Clarithromycin in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Initial Parenteral Treatment

Author:

Finch R.1,Schürmann D.2,Collins O.3,Kubin R.4,McGivern J.3,Bobbaers H.5,Izquierdo J. L.6,Nikolaides P.7,Ogundare F.8,Raz R.9,Zuck P.10,Hoeffken G.11

Affiliation:

1. Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham

2. Charité, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin

3. Bayer plc, Newbury, United Kingdom

4. Bayer AG, Wuppertal

5. U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

6. Hospital General de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain

7. AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

8. Tambo Memorial Hospital, Boksburg, South Africa

9. Haemek Medical Centre, Afula, Israel

10. Hopital Notre-Dame de Bon-Secours, Metz, France

11. Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of the present trial was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of moxifloxacin (400 mg) given intravenously (i.v.) once daily followed by oral moxifloxacin (400 mg) for 7 to 14 days with the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of co-amoxiclav (1.2 g) administered by i.v. infusion three times a day followed by oral co-amoxiclav (625 mg) three times a day, with or without clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily (i.v. or orally), for 7 to 14 days in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral therapy. A total of 628 patients were enrolled and assessed by evaluation of their clinical and bacteriological responses 5 to 7 days and 21 to 28 days after administration of the last dose of study medication. Although the trial was designed, on the basis of predefined outcomes, to demonstrate the equivalence of the two regimens, the results showed statistically significant higher clinical success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.4%, and for comparator regimen, 85.4%; difference [Δ], 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91 to 13.19%; P = 0.004) and bacteriological success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.7%, and for comparator regimen, 81.7%; Δ, 12.06%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 22.91%) for patients treated with moxifloxacin. This superiority was seen irrespective of the severity of the pneumonia and whether or not the combination therapy included a macrolide. The time to resolution of fever was also statistically significantly faster for patients who received moxifloxacin (median time, 2 versus 3 days), and the duration of hospital admission was approximately 1 day less for patients who received moxifloxacin. The treatment was converted to oral therapy immediately after the initial mandatory 3-day period of i.v. administration for a larger proportion of patients in the moxifloxacin group than patients in the comparator group (151 [50.2%] versus 57 [17.8%] patients). There were fewer deaths (9 [3.0%] versus 17 [5.3%]) and fewer serious adverse events (38 [12.6%] versus 53 [16.5%]) in the moxifloxacin group than in the comparator group. The rates of drug-related adverse events were comparable in both groups (38.9% in each treatment group). The overall incidence of laboratory abnormalities was similar in both groups. Thus, it is concluded that monotherapy with moxifloxacin is superior to that with a standard combination regimen of a β-lactam and a β-lactamase inhibitor, co-amoxiclav, with or without a macrolide, clarithromycin, in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a hospital.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference19 articles.

1. Beam, T. R., D. N. Gilbert, and C. M. Kunin. 1992. General guidelines for the clinical evaluation of anti-infective drug products. Clin. Infect. Dis.15(Suppl.):S5-S32.

2. Beam T. R. D. N. Gilbert and C. M. Kunin. 1993. General guidelines for the clinical evaluation of anti-infective drug products. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Munich Germany.

3. The British Thoracic Society. 1993. Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults admitted to hospital. Br. J. Hosp. Med.49:346-350.

4. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. 1997. Notes for guidance on evaluation of new anti-bacterial medical products. 3983:CPMP/EWP/558./95. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products London United Kingdom.

5. Dresser, L. D., M. S. Niederman, and J. A. Paladino. 2001. Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Chest119:1439-1448.

Cited by 142 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3