Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham,1 and
2. Biostar, Inc., Boulder, Colorado 803012
3. Jefferson County Department of Health,3 Birmingham, Alabama 35294, and
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Chlamydia trachomatis
infections are the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States. In acute-care settings such as clinics and emergency rooms, a desirable chlamydia screening assay should exhibit good sensitivity and good specificity and should provide test results while the patient is still present. The Biostar Chlamydia OIA (Biostar, Inc., Boulder, Colo.) is an optical immunoassay (OIA) that provides test results in less than 30 min and that uses a test format that allows office-based testing. This assay is performed entirely at room temperature without the need for rotators or other specialized equipment. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA for the detection of
C. trachomatis
with the performance of cell culture, direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay (Syva MicroTrak; Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.), and PCR (Roche Amplicor
Chlamydia trachomatis
; Roche, Branchburg, N.J.) for the detection of
C. trachomatis
infections in women attending an urban STD clinic. For calculations of relative test performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values), patient specimens that yielded positive results by two or more of the four assays (cell culture, DFA assay, PCR, and OIA) were classified as “true infections.” By these criteria, 42 of 306 total specimens were classified as positive for
C. trachomatis
(positive prevalence, 13.7%), 11 (3.6%; 10 by PCR and 1 by DFA assay) were positive by a single assay, and 253 (82.7%) were negative by all four tests. All culture-positive specimens were also positive by at least one other assay. Among the culture-negative specimens, 14 (5%) specimens were positive by two of the three non-culture-based assays used. By using the criterion that positivity by at least two of the tests indicated a true infection, the relative sensitivities were as follows: culture and PCR, 92.9% each; Biostar Chlamydia OIA, 73.8%; and DFA assay, 59.5%.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference18 articles.
1. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women;Baselski V. S.;Obstet. Gynecol.,1987
2. Drew
W. L.
Clyde
W. A.
Jr.
Kenny
G. E.
Schachter
J.
Cumitech 19
1984Laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial and mycoplasmal infections. Coordinating ed. L. W. Drew. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
3. Eng
T. R.
Butler
W. T.
The hidden epidemic; confronting sexually transmitted diseases
1997
31 and 44–45. National Academy Press Washington D.C.
4. Evaluation of Bias in Diagnostic-Test Sensitivity and Specificity Estimates Computed by Discrepant Analysis
5. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis;Hadgu A.;Lancet,1996
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献