Identification of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile by PCR

Author:

Kato Haru1,Kato Naoki1,Watanabe Kunitomo1,Iwai Naoichi2,Nakamura Haruhi2,Yamamoto Toshinobu3,Suzuki Kanzo3,Kim Shin-Moo4,Chong Yunsop5,Wasito Eddy Bagus6

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Anaerobic Bacteriology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu,1 and

2. Department of Pediatrics, Meitetsu Hospital,2 and

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoyashi Koseiin Geriatric Hospital,3 Nagoya, Japan;

4. Department of Clinical Pathology, Wonkwang Public Health Junior College, Iri,4 and

5. Department of Clinical Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,5 Korea; and

6. Tropical Disease Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile have been reported to produce both toxins A and B nearly always, and nontoxigenic strains have been reported to produce neither of these toxins. Recent studies indicate that it is not always true. We established a PCR assay to differentiate toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive (toxin A−, toxin B+) strains from both toxin-positive (toxin A+, toxin B+) strains and both toxin-negative (toxin A−, toxin B−) strains as an alternative to cell culture assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). By using the PCR primer set NK11 and NK9 derived from the repeating sequences of the toxin A gene, a shorter segment (ca. 700 bp) was amplified from toxin A−, toxin B+ strains compared to the size of the segment amplified from toxin A+, toxin B+ strains (ca. 1,200 bp), and no product was amplified from toxin A−, toxin B− strains. We examined a total of 421 C. difficile isolates by PCR. Of these, 48 strains showed a shorter segment by the PCR, were negative by ELISAs for the detection of toxin A, and were positive by cell culture assay. Although the cytotoxin produced by the toxin A−, toxin B+ strains was neutralized by anti-toxin B serum, the appearance of the cytotoxic effects on Vero cell monolayers was distinguishable from that of toxin A+, toxin B+ strains. By immunoblotting, the 44 toxin A−, toxin B+ strains were typed to serogroup F and the remaining four strains were serogroup X. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis separated the 48 strains into 19 types. The PCR assay for the detection of the repeating sequences combined with PCR amplification of the nonrepeating sequences of either the toxin A or the toxin B gene is indicated to be useful for differentiating toxin A−, toxin B+ strains from toxin A+, toxin B+ and toxin A−, toxin B− strains and will contribute to elucidation of the precise role of toxin A−, toxin B+ strains in intestinal diseases.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Reference19 articles.

1. Allen S. D. Baron E. J. Clostridium Manual of clinical microbiology 5th ed. Balows A. Hausler W. J. Jr. Herrmann K. L. Isenberg H. D. Shadomy H. J. 1991 505 521 American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C

2. Should laboratories test for toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile?;Altaie S. S.;Lab. Med.,1996

3. Biochemical characterization and biologic actions of two toxins (D-1 and D-2) from Clostridium difficile;Banno Y.;Rev. Infect. Dis.,1984

4. Nucleotide sequence of Clostridium difficile toxin B gene;Barroso L. A.;Nucleic Acids Res.,1990

5. Molecular, immunological, and biological characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile

Cited by 305 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3