Affiliation:
1. Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Albany Medical College,1 and
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia2; and
3. Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia3
4. Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health,4Albany, New York;
Abstract
ABSTRACT
During an outbreak of diarrhea in a general hospital in 1992, 166
Clostridium difficile
isolates from 102 patients were typed by restriction enzyme analysis (REA), arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR), and protein profile analysis (PP) techniques. A total of 18 types and 5 subtypes were identified by REA, 32 types were identified by AP-PCR, and 9 types were identified by PP. Analysis of the data indicated the presence of a predominant strain among 76, 75, and 84% of the isolates by REA, AP-PCR, and PP, respectively. Subsequently, 45
C. difficile
isolates which had been collected in 1990 from 33 patients in the same hospital following a significant increase in the number of cases of diarrhea caused by
C. difficile
were studied by REA, AP-PCR, and PP typing techniques. Thirteen types and one subtype were identified by REA, 12 types were identified by AP-PCR, and 5 types were identified by PP. As with the isolates from 1992, a dominant strain was identified. This strain was represented by 53, 64, and 70% of the total number of isolates when the strains were typed by REA, AP-PCR, and PP, respectively. Every isolate (210 of 211) from both 1990 and 1992 that was available for typing was typeable by all three methods. Furthermore, the same dominant strain was identified in both 1990 and 1992 by each method. This study demonstrates that each of the three typing methods can be useful in epidemiologic investigations of
C. difficile
outbreaks and that one strain can be dominant in an institution over a number of years.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献