Serological Responses in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection and Cross-Reactivity with Human Coronaviruses 229E, OC43, and NL63
-
Published:2005-11
Issue:11
Volume:12
Page:1317-1321
-
ISSN:1556-6811
-
Container-title:Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Clin Vaccine Immunol
Author:
Chan K. H.1, Cheng V. C. C.1, Woo P. C. Y.1, Lau S. K. P.1, Poon L. L. M.1, Guan Y.1, Seto W. H.1, Yuen K. Y.1, Peiris J. S. M.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong and Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The serological response profile of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) infection was defined by neutralization tests and subclass-specific immunofluorescent (IF) tests using serial sera from 20 patients. SARS CoV total immunoglobulin (Ig) (IgG, IgA, and IgM [IgGAM]) was the first antibody to be detectable. There was no difference in time to seroconversion between the patients who survived (
n
= 14) and those who died (
n
= 6). Although SARS CoV IgM was still detectable by IF tests with 8 of 11 patients at 7 months postinfection, the geometric mean titers dropped from 282 at 1 month postinfection to 19 at 7 months (
P
= 0.001). In contrast, neutralizing antibody and SARS CoV IgGAM and IgG antibody titers remained stable over this period. The SARS CoV antibody response was sometimes associated with an increase in preexisting IF IgG antibody titers for human coronaviruses OC43, 229E, and NL63. There was no change in IF IgG titer for virus capsid antigen from the herpesvirus that was used as an unrelated control, Epstein-Barr virus. In contrast, patients who had OC43 infections, and probably also 229E infections, without prior exposure to SARS CoV had increases of antibodies specific for the infecting virus but not for SARS CoV. There is a need for awareness of cross-reactive antibody responses between coronaviruses when interpreting IF serology.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Microbiology (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference19 articles.
1. Chan, K. H., J. S. Tam, J.S. Peiris, W. H. Seto, and M. H. Ng. 2001. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in infancy. J. Clin. Virol.21:57-62. 2. Chan, K. H., L. L. Poon, V.C. Cheng, Y. Guan, I. F. Hung, J. Kong, L. Y. Yam, W. H. Seto, K. Y. Yuen, and J. S. Peiris. 2004. Detection of SARS coronavirus in patients with suspected SARS. Emerg. Infect. Dis.10:294-299. 3. Che, X. Y., L. W. Qiu, Z. Y. Liao, Y. D. Wang, K. Wen, Y. X. Pan, W. Hao, Y. B. Mei, V. C. Cheng, and K. Y. Yuen. 2005. Antigenic cross-reactivity between severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus and human coronaviruses 229E and OC43. J. Infect. Dis.191:2033-2037. 4. Drosten, C., S. Gunther, W. Preister, S. van der Werf, H. R. Brodt, S. Becker, H. Rabenau, M. Panning, L. Kolesnikova, R. A. Fouchier, A. Berger, A. M. Burguiere, J. Cinatl, M. Eickmann, N. Escriou, K. Grywna, S. Kramme, J. C. Manuguerra, S. Muller, V. Rickerts, M. Sturmer, S. Vieth, H. D. Klenk, A. D. Osterhaus, H. Schmitz, and H. W. Doerr. 2003. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.348:1967-1976. 5. Development and application of an enzyme immunoassay for coronavirus OC43 antibody in acute respiratory illness
Cited by
98 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|