Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia

Author:

Gerna G1,Revello M G1,Percivalle E1,Morini F1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Infectious Diseases, Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Italy.

Abstract

The main parameters of immunostaining techniques, i.e., the type of fixative, immunocytochemical reaction, and quality of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), for quantitation of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) antigenemia in peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (currently performed by the indirect immunofluorescence or immunoperoxidase reaction by using MAbs to HCMV pp65) were investigated in order to optimize procedural steps and reagents. Significantly better results (in terms of the number of positive cells) were obtained on multiple cytospin preparations from heart transplant recipients with HCMV viremia when we used (i) formalin instead of methanol-acetone fixation and (ii) the indirect immunofluorescence reaction instead of the immunoperoxidase reaction, the avidin-biotin complex method, or the alkaline phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase procedure. In addition, comparison of the staining capabilities of three MAbs to pp65, which were developed in the laboratory and which were reactive to different epitopes of the protein, with a commercially available MAb (Clonab CMV) for determination of HCMV antigenemia showed that, while individual MAbs did not provide better results, the pool of MAbs detected a significantly higher number of positive peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes than Clonab CMV did. In addition, the sensitivity of the pool in detecting patients with low levels of viremia (less than 5/2 x 10(5) cells inoculated) as antigenemia positive was 100%, whereas the sensitivity of Clonab CMV was 47%. No differences in the specificities between the two MAb preparations were observed.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 240 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3