In vitro transcription of the histidine utilization (hutUH) operon from Klebsiella aerogenes

Abstract

The promoter region preceding the hutUH operon in Klebsiella aerogenes contains two oppositely oriented, overlapping promoters. In the absence of catabolite gene activator protein-cyclic AMP (CAP-cAMP), transcription proceeds primarily from the backward-oriented promoter (Pc), whose function has not yet been determined, and only very weakly from the forward hutUH promoter, hutUp. In the presence of CAP-cAMP, Pc is repressed and transcription from hutUp is favored. Two protein components required for this in vitro transcription system, RNA polymerase (RNAP) and CAP, were purified from K. aerogenes and were shown to be functionally interchangeable with the corresponding proteins from Escherichia coli, suggesting that E. coli RNAP could be used to study some aspects of hut transcription. We showed that a gradual activation of hutUp (by increasing concentrations of CAP, cAMP, or glycerol) resulted in a parallel repression of Pc, arguing in favor of a direct competition between the two promoters. The presence of a DNA sequence resembling the consensus for CAP-binding sites and centered at nucleotide -82 (relative to hutUp) initially suggested that a primary role of CAP was to repress Pc, thereby indirectly activating hutUp. However, the relatively slow formation of open complexes at Pc, even in the absence of CAP-cAMP, showed that Pc is a weak promoter and likely to be a poor competitor for RNAP. The observed dominance of Pc over hutUp suggested that the latter is an even weaker promoter. Thus, repression of Pc would not be sufficient to cause the observed increase in hutUp activity, and the CAP-cAMP complex must play a direct role in the activation of hutUp.