Rapid and Simple Approach for Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolates by PCR-Based Genomic Deletion Analysis

Author:

Parsons Linda M.12,Brosch Roland3,Cole Stewart T.3,Somoskövi Ákos14,Loder Arthur1,Bretzel Gisela5,van Soolingen Dick6,Hale Yvonne M.7,Salfinger Max128

Affiliation:

1. Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health,

2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany

3. Unité de Génétique Moléculaire Bactérienne, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

5. Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany

6. National Institute of Public Health, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

7. Bureau of Laboratories, Florida Department of Health, Jacksonville, Florida

8. Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although the virulences and host ranges differ among members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (TBC; M. tuberculosis , M. africanum , M. canettii , M. microti , M. bovis , and M. bovis BCG), commercially available molecular assays cannot differentiate these organisms because of the genetic identities of their 16S rRNA gene sequences. Comparative genomic analyses with the complete DNA sequence of M. tuberculosis H37Rv has provided information on regions of difference (RD 1 to RD 16) deleted in members of the TBC other than M. tuberculosis . To determine whether deletion analysis could accurately differentiate members of TBC, we used PCR to assess the presence or absence of specific regions of the genome in 88 well-characterized isolates of M. tuberculosis , M. africanum , M. microti , M. bovis , and M. bovis BCG. The identifications obtained by use of the specific deletion profiles correlated 100% with the original identifications for all TBC members except M. africanum , but further characterization resulted in profiles specific for all members. Although six RD regions were used in the analyses with the original 88 isolates, it was found that the use of RD 1, RD 9, and RD 10 was sufficient for initial screenings, followed by the use of RD 3, RD 5, and RD 11 if the results for any of the first three regions were negative. When 605 sequential clinical isolates were screened, 578 (96%) were identified as M. tuberculosis , 6 (1%) were identified as M. africanum , 8 (1%) were identified as M. bovis , and 13 (2%) were identified as M. bovis BCG. Since PCR-based assays can be implemented in most clinical mycobacteriology laboratories, this approach provides a rapid and simple means for the differentiation of members of TBC, especially M. bovis and M. tuberculosis , when it is important to distinguish between zoonotic sources (i.e., cattle and unpasteurized dairy products) and human sources of tuberculosis disease.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3