Author:
Baselski V S,Robison M K,Jennings B R
Abstract
In a comparison of two commercially available chlamydial isolation systems in which cycloheximide-treated McCoy cell monolayers are used, the system from Bartels Immunodiagnostic Supplies, Inc., Bellevue, Wash., was found to be superior to that from M. A. Bioproducts, Walkersville, Md. for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by iodine staining. Of 288 clinical specimens run in parallel, 47 (16.3%) were positive, with 16 of 47 positive results detected in the Bartels system only and 1 of 47 positive results detected in the M. A. Bioproducts system only (P less than 0.001). A comparison of the number of inclusion-forming units per cover slip from clinical specimens and passaged isolates also showed that the Bartels cell system demonstrated higher inclusion counts than the M. A. Bioproducts system. In routine clinical use, overall isolation rates were higher (P less than 0.001) and contamination rates were lower (P less than 0.001) with the Bartels system as compared with results obtained in a previous time period in which the M. A. Bioproducts system was used.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference21 articles.
1. Serum modulation of cell susceptibility to chiamydial infection;Allan I.;FEMS Microbiol. Lett.,1977
2. Armitage P. 1974. Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Scientific Publisher Oxford England.
3. Comparison of methods for cultivation and isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis;Benes S.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1982
4. Bird B. R. and F. T. Forrester. 1980. Laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections p. 41-79. Centers for Disease Control Atlanta Ga.
5. Suppression of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion formation by fetal calf serum in cycloheximidetreated McCoy cells;Evans R. T.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1980
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献