Affiliation:
1. School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
2. Procter and Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Oral bacterial microcosms, established using saliva inocula from three individuals, were maintained under a feast-famine regime within constant-depth film fermenters. Steady-state communities were exposed four times daily, postfeeding, to a chlorhexidine (CHX) gluconate-containing mouthwash (CHXM) diluted to 0.06% (wt/vol) antimicrobial content. The microcosms were characterized by heterotrophic plate counts and PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). CHXM caused significant decreases in both total anaerobe and total aerobe/facultative anaerobe counts (
P
< 0.05), together with lesser decreases in gram-negative anaerobes. The degree of streptococcal and actinomycete inhibition varied considerably among individuals. DGGE showed that CHXM exposure caused considerable decreases in microbial diversity, including marked reductions in
Prevotella
sp. and
Selenomonas infelix
. Pure-culture studies of 10 oral bacteria (eight genera) showed that
Actinomyces naeslundii
,
Veillonella dispar
,
Prevotella nigrescens
, and the streptococci were highly susceptible to CHX, while
Lactobacillus rhamnosus
,
Fusobacterium nucleatum
, and
Neisseria subflava
were the least susceptible. Determination of the MICs of triclosan, CHX, erythromycin, penicillin V, vancomycin, and metronidazole for microcosm isolates, before and after 5 days of CHXM exposure, showed that CHXM exposure altered the distribution of isolates toward those that were less susceptible to CHX (
P
< 0.05). Changes in susceptibility distributions for the other test agents were not statistically significant. In conclusion, population changes in plaque microcosms following repeated exposure to CHXM represented an inhibition of the most susceptible flora with a clonal expansion of less susceptible species.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference51 articles.
1. Block, C., and M. Furman. 2002. Association between intensity of chlorhexidine use and microorganisms of reduced susceptibility in a hospital environment. J. Hosp. Infect.51:201-206.
2. Bonesvoll, P., P. Lokken, G. Rölla, and P. N. Paus. 1974 Retention of chlorhexidine in the human oral cavity after mouthrinses. Arch. Oral Biol.19:1209-1212.
3. Bradshaw, D. J., P. D. Marsh, G. K. Watson, and D. Cummins. 1993. The effects of triclosan and zinc citrate, alone and in combination, on a community of oral bacteria grown in-vitro.J. Dent. Res.72:25-30.
4. Briner, W. W., and J. A. Wunder. 1977. Sensitivity of dog plaque microorganisms to chlorhexidine during longitudinal studies. J. Periodontal Res.12:135-139.
5. Davies, G. E., J. Francis, A. R. Martin, F. L. Rose, and G. Swain. 1954. 1:6-Di 4-chlorophenyldiguanidohexane (“Hibitane”). Laboratory investigation of a new antibacterial agent of high potency. Br. J. Pharmacol.9:192-196.
Cited by
108 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献