Affiliation:
1. National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands
2. Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The mycobacterium growth indicator tube (MGIT960) automated liquid medium testing method is becoming the international gold standard for second-line drug susceptibility testing of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
complex isolates. We performed a comparative study of the current gold standard in the Netherlands, the Middlebrook 7H10 agar dilution method, the MGIT960 system, and the GenoType MTBDR
sl
genotypic method for rapid screening of aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance. We selected 28 clinical multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant
M. tuberculosis
complex strains and
M. tuberculosis
H37Rv. We included amikacin, capreomycin, moxifloxacin, prothionamide, clofazimine, linezolid, and rifabutin in the phenotypic test panels. For prothionamide and moxifloxacin, the various proposed breakpoint concentrations were tested by using the MGIT960 method. The MGIT960 method yielded results 10 days faster than the agar dilution method. For amikacin, capreomycin, linezolid, and rifabutin, results obtained by all methods were fully concordant. Applying a breakpoint of 0.5 μg/ml for moxifloxacin led to results concordant with those of both the agar dilution method and the genotypic method. For prothionamide, concordance was noted only at the lowest and highest MICs. The phenotypic methods yielded largely identical results, except for those for prothionamide. Our study supports the following breakpoints for the MGIT960 method: 1 μg/ml for amikacin, linezolid, and clofazimine, 0.5 μg/ml for moxifloxacin and rifabutin, and 2.5 μg/ml for capreomycin. No breakpoint was previously proposed for clofazimine. For prothionamide, a division into susceptible, intermediate, and resistant seems warranted, although the boundaries require additional study. The genotypic assay proved a reliable and rapid method for predicting aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference19 articles.
1. David, H. L., N. Rastogi, S. Clavel-Sérès, and F. Clément. 1987. Studies on clofazimine-resistance in mycobacteria: is the inability to isolate drug-resistance mutants related to its mode of action? Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Mikrobiol. Hyg. A 266 : 292-304.
2. Ginsburg, A. S., J. H. Grosset, and W. R. Bishai. 2003. Fluoroquinolones, tuberculosis, and resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3 : 432-442.
3. Global Alliance for TB Drug Development. 2008. Handbook of anti-tuberculosis agents. Tuberculosis 88 : 85-170.
4. GenoType MTBDRsl manual v1.0. 2009
5. Feasibility of the GenoType MTBDR
sl
Assay for Fluoroquinolone, Amikacin-Capreomycin, and Ethambutol Resistance Testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Strains and Clinical Specimens
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献