Evaluation of two commercial human T-cell lymphotropic virus western blot (immunoblot) kits with problem specimens

Abstract

We evaluated two commercial human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) Western blot (WB; immunoblot) kits, Cambridge Biotech Corp. (CBC) and Diagnostic Biotechnology Ltd. (DBL). Both methods employ HTLV type I (HTLV-I) viral lysate and rgp21. The DBL WB kit also distinguishes between HTLV-I and HTLV-II antibodies, using an HTLV-I-specific and an HTLV-II-specific recombinant. Fifty weakly reactive HTLV-II-positive plasma specimens which were falsely negative with the Abbott enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and 50 Ortho EIA false-positive samples were selected to determine sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivities of the CBC and the DBL WB kits were 90 and 68%, respectively. All positive samples reacted with rgp21 in both kits, but some did not display core bands. Five samples were typed as HTLV-I and four were typed as dual infection by the DBL WB kit. The specificities of the CBC and DBL kits were 48 and 70%, respectively. The most prevalent WB reaction with the negative samples was with the core protein, p19, followed by p24 and p28 for CBC and rgp21 and p28 for DBL. DBL had two false-positive interpretations, and CBC had none, rgp21 was the most sensitive antigen in both kits for the weakly reactive HTLV-II samples. If all samples not reacting with this protein were interpreted as WB negative, regardless of other bands, the specificity would improve to 90% for CBC and 86% for DBL.