Radiocapitellar and Ulnotrochlear Pressures Increase in a Radial Head Fracture Model

Abstract

Background: Changes in intra-articular pressure have not been previously described in relation to the management of radial head fractures. We hypothesized that pressure within the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints would increase with progressive radial head resection, mimicking a displaced radial head fracture, in a cadaveric model. Methods: Ten cadaveric specimens were tested. Intra-articular pressure sensors were used to measure pressure within the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints with the forearm in full supination. The elbow was loaded to 100 N in extension, 45° of flexion, and 90° of flexion under the following conditions: (1) intact radial head, (2) 20% radial head resection, (3) 40% radial head resection, and (4) 100% radial head resection. Results: The distribution of pressure between the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints did not change with sequential, partial resection of the radial head (radiocapitellar joint, between 48.92% and 53.79%; ulnotrochlear joint, between 46.21% and 51.08%). After 20% resection, radiocapitellar peak contact pressure (PCP) increased by 22% (from 1,410 to 1,721.5 kPa) and ulnotrochlear PCP increased by 36% (from 1,319 to 1,797.5 kPa). After 40% resection, radiocapitellar PCP increased by 123% (from 1,410 to 3,145 kPa; p = 0.0003) and ulnotrochlear PCP increased by 105% (from 1,319 to 2,702 kPa; p = 0.007). Ulnotrochlear PCP increased by a total of 159% after complete radial head resection (from 1,319 to 3,415.5 kPa; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Pressures in the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints were equally distributed with an intact radial head and after partial resection. Radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear pressures increased with increasing radial head resection, significantly exceeding 100% of normal after radial head resection of 40% of the anterolateral diameter. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.