Hip Osteoarthritis in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Severe Adult Spinal Deformity

Author:

Diebo Bassel G.1ORCID,Alsoof Daniel1ORCID,Balmaceno-Criss Mariah1ORCID,Daher Mohammad1ORCID,Lafage Renaud2ORCID,Passias Peter G.3ORCID,Ames Christopher P.4ORCID,Shaffrey Christopher I.5ORCID,Burton Douglas C.6ORCID,Deviren Vedat4ORCID,Line Breton G.7ORCID,Soroceanu Alex8,Hamilton D. Kojo9ORCID,Klineberg Eric O.10ORCID,Mundis Gregory M.11ORCID,Kim Han Jo12ORCID,Gum Jeffrey L.13ORCID,Smith Justin S.14ORCID,Uribe Juan S.15ORCID,Kebaish Khaled M.16ORCID,Gupta Munish C.17ORCID,Nunley Pierce D.18ORCID,Eastlack Robert K.11,Hostin Richard19ORCID,Protopsaltis Themistocles S.3ORCID,Lenke Lawrence G.20ORCID,Hart Robert A.21ORCID,Schwab Frank J.2ORCID,Bess Shay7ORCID,Lafage Virginie2ORCID,Daniels Alan H.1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, Rhode Island

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY

3. Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY

4. University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California

5. Duke Spine Division, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

7. Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado

8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

9. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

10. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, California

11. San Diego Spine, La Jolla, California

12. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

13. Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky

14. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

15. Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona

16. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

17. Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri

18. Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana

19. Southwest Scoliosis and Spine Institute, Dallas, Texas

20. The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

21. Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

Background: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is common in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Limited data exist on the prevalence of hip OA in patients with ASD, or on its impact on baseline and postoperative alignment and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Therefore, this paper will assess the prevalence and impact of hip OA on alignment and PROMs. Methods: Patients with ASD who underwent L1-pelvis or longer fusions were included. Two independent reviewers graded hip OA with the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification and stratified it by severity into non-severe (KL grade 1 or 2) and severe (KL grade 3 or 4). Radiographic parameters and PROMs were compared among 3 patient groups: Hip-Spine (hip KL grade 3 or 4 bilaterally), Unilateral (UL)-Hip (hip KL grade 3 or 4 unilaterally), or Spine (hip KL grade 1 or 2 bilaterally). Results: Of 520 patients with ASD who met inclusion criteria for an OA prevalence analysis, 34% (177 of 520) had severe bilateral hip OA and unilateral or bilateral hip arthroplasty had been performed in 8.7% (45 of 520). A subset of 165 patients had all data components and were examined: 68 Hip-Spine, 32 UL-Hip, and 65 Spine. Hip-Spine patients were older (67.9 ± 9.5 years, versus 59.6 ± 10.1 years for Spine and 65.8 ± 7.5 years for UL-Hip; p < 0.001) and had a higher frailty index (4.3 ± 2.6, versus 2.7 ± 2.0 for UL-Hip and 2.9 ± 2.0 for Spine; p < 0.001). At 1 year, the groups had similar lumbar lordosis, yet the Hip-Spine patients had a worse sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) measurement (45.9 ± 45.5 mm, versus 25.1 ± 37.1 mm for UL-Hip and 19.0 ± 39.3 mm for Spine; p = 0.001). Hip-Spine patients also had worse Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Summary scores at baseline (25.7 ± 9.3, versus 28.7 ± 9.8 for UL-Hip and 31.3 ± 10.5 for Spine; p = 0.005) and 1 year postoperatively (34.5 ± 11.4, versus 40.3 ± 10.4 for UL-Hip and 40.1 ± 10.9 for Spine; p = 0.006). Conclusions: This study of operatively treated ASD revealed that 1 in 3 patients had severe hip OA bilaterally. Such patients with severe bilateral hip OA had worse baseline SVA and PROMs that persisted 1 year following ASD surgery, despite correction of lordosis. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sagittal spinal alignment measurements and evaluation: Historical perspective;North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ);2024-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3