Rozporządzenia z mocą ustawy – modele, teoria i praktyka w polskim systemie parlamentarno-gabinetowym w latach 1921–1926 oraz po 1989 r.

Author:

Bień-Kacała Agnieszka1ORCID,Tarnowska Anna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland

Abstract

Acts with the Force of Statute – Models, Theory, and Practice in the Polish Parliamentary-Cabinet System in the Years 1921–1926 and after 1989 The centenary of the enactment of the March Constitution in Poland prompts questions about the constituent parts of the achievements of Polish constitutionalism of that period. The authors have found the issue of the sources of law worthy of attention, and among the latter, especially those acts that are situated between the classically conceived competences of the authorities, i.e., acts with the force of statute issued by the organs of executive authority. These acts, formally absent from the system of sources of law of the March Constitution until the enactment of the August amendment of 1926, appeared in the practice of the Second Republic at the time of the budgetary crisis in 1924, in the form of acts issued “by the President of the Republic on the basis of resolutions of the Council of Ministers”. These “special kinds of autonomous regulations” [Z. Cybichowski] provoked intensive discussions regarding both the admissibility of such delegation of legislative power, as well as the legal essence and constitutionality of aforementioned regulations. The authors would like to take a closer look at the institution of legal acts with the force of statutes as sources functioning in the era of democratic constitutional solutions establishing a parliamentary-cabinet system [i.e., in the years 1921–1926 and after 1989], without neglecting the historical and comparative context in which the examined institution evolved.

Funder

Narodowe Centrum Nauki

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

General Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. 1. Jaworski, Władysław Leopold. Uwagi prawnicze o projekcie konstytucji. Odczyt w Towarzystwie Prawniczym d. 7 marca r. 1921. Biblioteka Jagiellońska, rkps 8725 IV.

2. 2. Biuletyn Komisji Konstytucyjnej Zgromadzenia Narodowego 10 (1995). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe [Biul. KKZN 10 (1995)].

3. 3. Biuletyn Komisji Konstytucyjnej Zgromadzenia Narodowego 23 (1996). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe [Biul. KKZN 23 (1996)].

4. 4. Biuletyn Komisji Konstytucyjnej Zgromadzenia Narodowego 38 (1997). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe [Biul. KKZN 38 (1997)].

5. 5. Sejm I kadencji, druk sejmowy 928.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3