Classifying handwriting samples according to their type using discriminant analysis

Author:

Dzida Jagoda1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Abstract

Classifying handwriting samples according to their type (i.e. natural, disguised, traced, simulated or unintentionally unnatural) is an important task in handwriting analysis. It may facilitate the collection of writing standards and also help experts to assess the differences between questioned material and comparative samples or to choose the best writing features and the most relevant examination protocol for the case. Current research aimed to create a method for classifying the type of a handwriting sample using discriminant analysis. Five basic types (i.e. natural, disguised, traced, simulated and unintentionally unnatural) and some subtypes were included in this study. Participants (N = 139) wrote their full signatures, fictional signatures or a short sentence. Motor and dimensional features were assessed. The methods proved to be more than twice as accurate in classifying samples according to their type than a random choice probability (e.g. 44% as opposed to 17% for the 6-types classifier). This proof-of-a-concept study demonstrates that handwriting samples may be classified according to their type with satisfying accuracy based on their writing features and statistical tools of discriminant analysis. However, further studies are necessary to improve the accuracy of the method.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference11 articles.

1. 1. Alford, E. F. (1970). Disguised handwriting. A statistical survey of how handwriting is most frequently disguised. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 15, 476-488.

2. Forensic handwriting examiners' opinions on the process of production of disguised and simulated signatures;Bird;Forensic Science International,2010

3. 3. Durina, M. E. (2005). Disguised signatures: random or repetitious? Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, 8, 9-16.

4. 4. Ellen, D., Day, S., Davies, C. (2018). The scientific examination of documents. Methods and techniques (4th ed., p. 248). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

5. Disguised handwriting;Harris;Journal of Criminal Law Criminology & Police Science 43 5,1953

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3