Practical dimension of issues related to assessing the reliability of sources and the trustworthiness of data and information

Author:

Kozłowski Józef1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Academy of Military Art in Warsaw

Abstract

The phases of preparation, analysis, integration, initial interpretation of data and intelligence are relatively widely described in the literature. Only the field of assessing the certainty of sources and the reliability of data and intelligence has not kept pace with the development of other elements in the domain of information operations. In view of the increasing intensity of activities carried out by potential adversaries, the methods, techniques and tools currently in use should be critically evaluated and their limitations identified, and attempts should be made to develop and implement new processes and procedures. Above all, the capacity to prepare and communicate increasingly accurate assessments of the certainty of sources and the reliability of data and information must be enhanced. Therefore, it is necessary to: quantify the accuracy of the information, prepare new procedures and software, study the degree of information redundancy, its completeness and level of diagnosticity. Acquisition and analytical apparatus staff must be aware of existing limitations and search for ways to solve problems. Such a search should not focus on one-size-fits-all methods, but on a pragmatic approach to each element.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

Pharmacology

Reference55 articles.

1. 1. ATP 2-91.8 Techniques for Document and Media Exploitation (document publication date: 5 V 2015).

2. 2. Balance of Power. Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, T.V. Paul, J.J. Wirtz, M. Fortman (eds.), Stanford University Press 2004.

3. 3. Breakspear A., A New Definition of Intelligence, "Intelligence and National Security" 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 678-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.699285.

4. 4. Bühlmann H., Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory, New York 1970.

5. 5. Capet P., d'Allones R., Information Evaluation in the Military Domain: Doctrines, Practices and Shortcomings, in: Information Evaluation, P. Capet, T. Delavallade (eds.), New York 2014.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3