Interferencja mechanizmu systemu odpowiedzialności wprowadzonego dyrektywą 2019/790 na wolność wypowiedzi

Author:

Milczarek Ewa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Szczecin, Poland

Abstract

The Internet has fundamentally influenced all aspects of life – including culture, increasing access to such goods. This access has become faster, simpler and cost-free, including access from illegal sources, thus potentially violating the rights of creators. For years, public debate has raised the problem of the “copyright crisis”, which has been unable to meet the challenges of our information society. The EU’s response to increasing protection for creators is Directive 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. Article 17 of this directive imposes an obligation on providers of online content sharing services to preventively control content posted by users – the so-called liability mechanism. This preventive control raises concerns about the potential violation of users’ right to freedom of expression. The article analyzes the mechanisms of the liability system, including the identification of subjective and objective aspects of the imposed obligations. This analysis was compiled with the standards of protection and restriction of freedom of expression in the conditions of the information society. The aim of the work is to assess whether the mechanism of the accountability system violates the essence of freedom of expression.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

Law,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Cultural Studies,Conservation

Reference36 articles.

1. 1. Ayman Abdel-Aziz A., Abdel-Salam H., El-Sayad Z., The role of ICTs in creating the new social public place of the digital era, "Alexandria Engineering Journal" 2016, nr 55(1) s. 487-493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.12.019

2. 2. Brkan M., The Concept of Essence of Fundamental Rights in the EU Legal Order: Peeling the Onion to its Core, "European Constitutional Law Review" 2018, nr 14(2), s. 332-368, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019618000159

3. 3. Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz K., Treść cyfrowa jako dobro prawnie chronione - charakterystyka ogólna, w: K. Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz (red.), Prawna ochrona treści cyfrowych, Wydawnictwo Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2021.

4. 4. Couto A., Copyright and Freedom of Expression: A Philosophical Map, w: A. Gosseries, A. Marciano, A. Strowel (red.), Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice, Palgrave Macmillan, Londyn 2008, s. 160-187.

5. 5. Dyrektywa 2000/31/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 8 czerwca 2000 r. w sprawie niektórych aspektów prawnych usług społeczeństwa informacyjnego, w szczególności handlu elektronicznego w ramach rynku wewnętrznego (dyrektywa o handlu elektronicznym), Dz. Urz. UE L 178 z 17.07.2000.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3