Balance of Rights in Directive 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Is the Opt-out Clause Sufficient for the Protection of Author’s Moral Rights?

Author:

Jerzyk Karolina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland

Abstract

Digitization is an important process taking place within contemporary legal systems, leaving its fingerprints on different branches of law and forcing changes to traditional industries while not sparing the system of cultural heritage protection. Cultural institutions are nowadays facing the challenge of combining mass digitization with public access to works which are part of their collections. At the same time they are struggling with the applicable copyright law. The new EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market addresses those needs, introducing a system of extended licencing granted by Collective Management Organizations (CMO) and facilitating an easier access to works which, due to their unresolved copyright status, were not ready to be publicly displayed. This article addresses the problem of striking a balance between the private and public interests involved in this process by analysing the opt-out procedure to the new licencing scheme, and confronting it with the traditional protection granted to authors based on moral rights. It seeks to answer the question whether the new opt-out system is sufficient to protect an author’s interests arising from his or her moral rights, and whether such interests would also be sufficiently safeguarded after an author’s death (post mortem auctoris).

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

Law,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Cultural Studies,Conservation

Reference39 articles.

1. 1. Axhamn J., The New Copyright Directive: Collective Licensing as a Way to Strike a Fair Balance between Creator and User Interests in Copyright Legislation (Article 12), 25 June 2019, http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/06/25/the-new-copyright-directive-col¬lective-licensing-as-a-way-to-strike-a-fair-balance-between-creator-and-user-inter¬ests-in-copyright-legislation-article-12/ [accessed: 20.08.2021].

2. 2. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (adopted 9 September 1886, entered into force 5 December 1887, last amended 28 September 1979) 828 UNTS 221.

3. 3. C-301/15, Soulier and Doke, Judgment of 16 November 2016, EU:C:2016:878.

4. 4. Carter v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 71 F.3d 77, 82 (2d Cir. 1995).

5. 5. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3