Freedom of Expression in Privacy vs. Public Interest, a Case for Open Justice in Extended Reality

Author:

Hadziselimovic Adnan1ORCID,Pijarski Krzysztof2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Media and Knowledge Sciences Meida, University of Malta, University of Malta

2. Łódź Film School, Poland

Abstract

This paper continues the discussion on advanced jurisprudence, outlined in Algorithms, Ethics and Justice (Hadzi, 2022), where restorative justice was proposed for the mitigation of artificial intelligence (AI) crimes. Algorithms, Ethics and Justice proposed an alternative approach to the current legal system by looking into restorative justice for AI crimes, and how the ethics of care could be applied to AI technologies. The paper signifies an expanded version of Hadzi’s contribution to the Digital Research in Humanities and Art Conference (Hadzi, 2023), focusing on the notion of cyber offenses in extended reality (XR), given the rise of the metaverse (Anderson, Rainie, 2022; Chohan, 2022), and the future scenario of bio-metrical data of EEG capable headsets (Graham, 2022) being misused by rogue companies and/or criminals (Jaber, 2022; Nair et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2022). The authors Begin by questioning the cyberspace – including the emerging metaverse – as public sphere, i.e. a social space in which democracy is being enacted to explore open justice in extended realities (XR), and then by continuing the discussion around the right to be forgotten and the freedom of the press versus privacy, through a comparative analysis between the legal situation in the EU and that of the USA. The paper concludes by warning against excessive state control while attempting to project a desirable scenario of multiple digital public spheres.

Funder

Erasmus+

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Reference75 articles.

1. 1. A v B Plc and Another (2002). Court of Appeal. https://vlex.co.uk/vid/v-b-plc-and-793097577 (accessed: 10.03.2024).

2. 2. Abbasi S.G. (2017). "Internet as a Public Space for Freedom of Expression: Myth or Reality?". SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3064175.

3. 3. Abramovsky A., Brook H.R., Cohen J.A., Freeman G., Goodale J.C., Schulz D.A., Schurr C. (1993). "Impact of the Media on Fair Trial Rights: Panel on Media Access". Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 3 (2), p. 291.

4. 4. Abuadbba A., Moore K., Tariq S. (2023). "Deepfake in the Metaverse: Security Implications for Virtual Gaming, Meetings, and Offices". arXiv:2303.14612 http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14612 (accessed: 10.03.2024).

5. 5. Anderson J., Rainie L. (2022). The Metaverse in 2040. Washington: Pew Research Center.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3