Wykorzystanie baz danych Narodowego Funduszu Zdrowia przy ocenie dowodów naukowych z praktyki klinicznej

Author:

Holko Przemysław1ORCID,Kawalec Paweł1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

Abstract

The use of the National Health Fund databases as a source of real-world evidence Patient medical records and administrative healthcare databases are possible sources of real-world evidence (RWE), i.e., evidence on the potential benefits and risks of a medical product. RWE can complement the evidence from randomized clinical trials. The wide range of information collected by the National Health Fund (NFZ) and the Ministry of Health in Poland ensures the versatility of the data that cover almost all patients treated in Poland. In addition to administrative data (without detailed information about patients and their disease), electronic medical records of some patient groups can be obtained from special programs (e.g., KOS-Zawał) or the System of Monitoring Drug Programs (SMPT). Low usage (only 37 studies) but high usability of NFZ databases as a source of RWE were identified. Joint analysis of data from administrative databases and SMPT can increase the credibility of the study, but limits the study to only patients treated within the Drug Programs.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

General Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. 1. ISPOR. 2022-2023 Top 10 HEOR Trends Report, 2022, https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/about-heor/top-10-heor-trends (dostęp: 12.05.2022).

2. 2. Gavrielov-Yusim N., Friger M., Use of Administrative Medical Databases in Population-based Research, "Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health" 2014; 68 (3): 283-287.

3. 3. Zarebska-Michaluk D., Jaroszewicz J., Rogalska M., et al., Effectiveness of Tocilizumab With and Without Dexamethasone in Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Study, "Journal of Inflammation Research" 2021; 14: 3359-3366.

4. 4. Offord C., The Surgisphere Scandal: What Went Wrong? Scientist, październik 2020, https://www.the-scientist.com/features/thesurgisphere-scandal-what-went-wrong-67955 (dostęp: 12.05.2022).

5. 5. How Real World Evidence Was Used to Support Approval of Ibrance for Male Breast Cancer, "The Cancer Letter" 2019; 45: 7-10, https://cancerletter.com/the-cancer-letter/20190419_2/ (dostęp: 20.02.2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3