Book reviews in the history of knowledge

Author:

Pleshkov AlekseiORCID,Surman JanORCID

Abstract

Academic reviewing, one of the communal academic practices, is a vital genre, in which epistemic virtues have been cultivated. In our article, we discuss reviews as a form of institutionalized critique, which historians could use to trace the changing epistemic virtues within humanities. We propose to use them analogously to Lorraine Daston’s and Peter Galison’s treatment of atlases in their seminal work Objectivity as a marker of changing epistemic virtues in natural sciences and medicine. Based on Aristotle’s virtue theory and its neo-Aristotelian interpretation in the second half of the 20th century, as well as on its most recent applications in the field of history and philosophy of science, we propose a general conceptual framework for analyzing reviews in their historical dimension. Besides, we contend that the analysis of reviews should be carried out taking into account their historical context of social, political, cultural and media-environment. Otherwise, one may risks presupposing the existence of an autonomous, disconnected community of scholars.

Funder

National Research University Higher School of Economics

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science

Reference68 articles.

1. Allen, Danielle S. 2004: Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004. ISBN: 978-0226014678.

2. Agassi, Joseph 2017: The Place of Dichotomies in Western Philosophy. Lecture at the International Conference “Academic Revolutions?” Understanding conceptual renewal and institutional innovation in the Modern World,” Poletayev Institute for Theoretical and Historical Studies in the Humanities National, Research University “Higher School of Economics,” Moscow 12–13. October 2017. Available online (12 October 2017): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKqkfNMaQO8&t=10s.

3. Aristotle 2009: The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by David Ross and Edited by Lesley Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199213610.

4. Bilhartz, Terry D. 1984: In 500 Words or Less: Academic Book Reviewing in American History. The History Teacher 17(4), pp. 525–536.

5. Creyghton, Camille; Huistra, Pieter; Keymeulen, Sarah; Paul, Herman 2016: Virtue language in historical scholarship: the cases of Georg Waitz, Gabriel Monod and Henri Pirenne. History of European Ideas 42(7), pp. 924–936, DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2016.1161536

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3