1. 1. Anderson, R. W. G., Streeter, L. D., Ponte, G., McLean, A. J. (2007). Pedestrian reconstruction using multibody MADYMO simulation and the Polar-II dummy: a comparison of head kinematics. Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Lyon, France, 18-21.
2. 2. Becker, T., Reade, M., Scurlock, B. (2015). Simulations of Pedestrian Impact Collisions with Virtual CRASH 3 and Comparisons with IPTM Staged Tests. Accident Reconstruction Journal, 26 (2). Pobrano z: http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00790 (dostęp: 25 maja 2022 r.).
3. 3. Bodolo, I., Nenad, M., Bodolo, T., Dejan, H. (2009). Drugi eksperiment realnog sudara drumskih vozila u R Srbiji. Pobrano z: https://www.vestacenja.co.rs/docs/sudar_r4_bicikl.pdf (dostęp: 25 maja 2022 r.).
4. 4. EuroNCAP. (2021). Assessment Protocol - Vulnerable Road User Protection. Version 10.0.5.4 https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/webwelt/article236020958/Biofidel-Dummys-Crashtests-werdenzunehmend-realistischer.html.
5. 5. Foster, C. D. (2022). Report on Generic Hull Live-Fire Test with PRIMUS Dummy. Pobrano z: https://www.crashtest-service.com/download-file?file_id=2128&file_code=42de3e4d85 (dostęp 15 maja 2022 r.).