Beyond mere facts: Epistemic profiles of conclusions to English- and Polish-language linguistics articles

Author:

Warchał Krystyna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Silesia in Katowice

Abstract

Expressions of epistemic stance in academic discourse reflect not only the authors’ commitment to the truth of what is being said, but also their awareness of other members of the discourse community, the current thinking within the discipline, and the established patterns of interaction. Stance-taking is strongly embedded in culture and language, as demonstrated in numerous studies that focus on L2 academic English (e.g. Hinkel 2002; Dontcheva-Navratilova 2018; Wu and Paltridge 2021) and, less often, academic communication in various linguistic contexts (e.g. Perez-Llantada 2010). This paper purues this latter line of inquiry and proposes a contrastive analysis of epistemic markers in conclusions to English- and Polish-language linguistics articles in an attempt to identify their epistemic profiles. Epistemic profile refers here to a combination of two features: the epistemic modal value (Halliday 1985/1994) which is marked more frequently than others across a text or text fragment, and the concurrence of modality markers with specific rhetorical moves (Swales 1990; Yang and Allison 2003). Thus, it provides information about the value of modalization and the type of content that tends to be modalized. The analysis was based on a two-part corpus of conclusions to 400 linguistics articles, with 200 English-language articles drawn from international databases and 200 Polish-language articles published in recognized national journals. In the first stage, the frequencies of epistemic markers in the two sub-corpora were calculated (Scott 2008) and a statistical analysis was applied to determine whether the differences were significant. In the second stage, 50 concluding sections from each sub-corpus were manually annotated for rhetorical moves to determine whether epistemic markers tended to occur within specific moves. The findings show statistically significant differences in the frequencies of high- and low-value epistemic markers in the sub-corpora and a tendency for epistemic markers to occur within moves that offer interpretive content.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference67 articles.

1. 1. Alramadan M.M. 2016. Appraisal in English and Arabic academic discourse: A contrastive study within a systemic functional perspective. [unpublished PhD dissertation, King Saud University].

2. 2. Arnaudet M.L., Barrett M.E. 1984. Approaches to academic reading and writing. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.

3. 3. Atkinson D. 1998. Integrating multiple analyses in historical studies of scientific discourse: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. - Battalio J.T. (ed.). Essays in the study of scientific discourse: Methods, practice, and pedagogy. Stamford (CT) London: Ablex: 139-165.

4. 4. Bamford J. 2005. Subjective or objective evaluation? Prediction in academic lectures. - Tognini-Bonelli E., Del Lungo Camiciotti G. (eds.). Strategies in academic discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 17-29.

5. 5. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. 1966/1967. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3