(Non)responsibility for Refugees – Communicating about the Belarusian-Polish Border (2021–2023)

Author:

Zessin-Jurek Lidia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Masaryk Institute and Archives of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Given that two dramatically different refugee regimens have developed along Poland’s eastern border, this essay explores the social conditions and discourses that facilitate such a radically different treatment of people. The Polish state’s violation of human rights on the Belarusian section of the border and the celebration of these rights on its Ukrainian section have become part of media spectacles. This text analyses both the technical and content-related issues of communication about migrants and refugees from the Global South. It includes typologies of attributional biases in the media towards people on the move, discusses their functions and the ways towards a normalisation of violence. The final section historicises the current negative responses to refugees and sets them in the wider context of the uneasy obligations imposed on the “West” by its professed values. In doing so, this essay touches upon questions not only of a sense of social responsibility, but also of actual responsibility for the people who have died in Polish forests and rivers.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Reference57 articles.

1. 1. Adam J., Hess S. (2023). Fortified Nationalism. Racializing Infrastructures and the Authoritarian Transformation of the Body Politic. A Field Trip to the Bifurcated Polish/EU Border Regime, "Movements. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies", Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 65-91.

2. 2. Agamben G. (2005). State of Exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

3. 3. Assmann A. (2020). Die Wiedererfindung der Nation. Warum wir sie fürchten und warum wir sie brauchen. C. H. Beck: München.

4. 4. Balogun B. (2024). Race and the Colour-Line The Boundaries of Europeanness in Poland. Abing-don, Oxon: Routledge.

5. 5. Bauman Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3