The process of reconciliation between Serbia and Kosovo and the international legal strategies of the EU States, the USA, and Russia(with particular emphasis on the activities of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers)

Author:

Andrzejczak-Świątek Małgorzata1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Wyższa Szkoła Policji w Szczytnie, Poland

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse the international legal and political process of reconciliation between Serbia and Kosovo in terms of its impact on the scope of development directions and strategies of the European Union countries as well as Russia and the USA. Particular emphasis was placed on the treatment of these issues in the light of the activities of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office. The main theses assumed for the purposes of this article are as follows: firstly, that the policy of reconciliation between Serbia and Kosovo is multidimensional, including the necessity of the process of international criminal liability for the crimes committed by both states, while at the same time influencing the dilemmas of the development directions of individual European countries, but also of the European Union and the United States. In addition, the legal and political stabilization of the Balkan region, especially in the context of relations between Kosovo and Serbia, and the possibility of cooperation with these states as part of intergovernmental international organizations, is strategically extremely important for the EU, the USA, as well as for Russia. The Author critically analyses issues using polemics with the standpoint presented in the doctrine of the subject as well as interpreting selected instruments of international law and Kosovo’s national law. The deliberations resulted in conclusions as to the determinants in terms of the directions of the legal and political development of the EU and Russia resulting from the complicated process of reconciliation and mutual settlement of sins by Serbia and Kosovo.

Publisher

Instytut Europy Srodkowej

Reference34 articles.

1. Cady J.-Ch., Booth N., Internationalized Courts in Kosovo: An UNMIK Perspective, [in:] Internationalized Criminal Courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia, C. P. R. Romano, A. Nollkaemper, J. K. Kleffner (eds.), Oxford 2004.

2. Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, https://www.scp-ks.org/en/documents/constitutional-amplements-article-162.

3. Del Ponte C., Madame Prosecutor: Confrontations with Humanity’s Worst Criminals and the Culture of Impunity, New York 2008.

4. Dietrich F.,The Status of Kosovo – reflection on the legitimacy of secession, “Ethics & Global Politics”, 2010, vol. 3, no. 2.

5. Domachowska A., Serbia i Kosowo: porozumienie o normalizacji relacji ekonomicznych, “Komentarze IEŚ”, 2020, no. 248.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3