Abstract
Aim of study: The production efficiency of crop rotations was evaluated based on the yield of the main crop (cereal grains and pea seeds) and yield of the by-product (straw) converted per cereal units (CU), and on total protein yield. Area of study: South-eastern Poland, Europe (2017-2019). Material and methods: The first order experimental factor included crop rotations: A): peas–durum wheat–spring barley; B): spring wheat–durum wheat–spring barley +oats; and C): spring barley–durum wheat–spring wheat. The second order experimental factor included tillage systems: CT, conventional tillage, RT, reduced tillage, and NT, no-tillage. Main results: The yield of pea seeds, cereal grains, and straw per CU was higher in crop rotation A than B (127.8 CU vs. 101.1 CU). Higher CU yields were also recorded in crop rotation C than B (by 18.9 CU). The tillage system had no effect on CU yield. The total protein yield was significantly higher in crop rotation A (2110.7 kg ha-1) than in crop rotations B (by 808.8 kg ha-1) and C (by 448.0 kg ha-1). A higher protein yield was also recorded in RT than in the NT system. Research highlights: The units used for CR assessment, i.e. CU and total protein yield, enable to reliably evaluate the production yield of both CRs and tillage systems.
Publisher
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Baker JM, Ochsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis, TJ, 2007. Tillage and soil carbon sequestration-what do we really know? Agric Ecosyst Environ 118: 1-5.
2. BBCH Working Group, 2001. Growth stages of mono-and dicotyledonous plants, 2nd ed; Meier U (Ed.), Fed Biol Res Centre Agr For, Blackwell, Hoboken.
3. Boyette CD, Hoagland RE, Weaver MA, 2008. Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Biol Manage 8: 18-24.
4. Brankatschk G, Finkbeiner M, 2014. Application of the cereal unit in a new allocation procedure for agricultural life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 73: 72-79.
5. Brankatschk G, Finkbeiner M, 2017. Crop rotations and crop residues are relevant parameters for agricultural carbon footprints. Agron Sustain Dev 37: 58.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献