Author:
López-Dávila Edelbis,Houbraken Michael,De Rop Jasmine,Du Laing Gijs,Romero Osvaldo,Spanoghe Pieter
Abstract
Aim of study: To quantify the toxicity and ecotoxicological pressure of pesticides in Sancti Spíritus province, Cuba, between 2011 and 2014.Material and methods: A longitudinal descriptive study was designed for the study period, to identify potential risks to the environment and human health associated with the use of pesticides. In order to determine the toxicity and ecotoxicity of pesticide use, ƩSeq (Spread equivalents), POCER (Pesticide Occupational and Environmental Risk) indicator, and the Toxic Load (TL) methodology of the Plant Health Cuban Institute were used.Main results: Corresponding to 62 chemical families, 124 active ingredients were applied in the province during the study period. Organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, inorganic compounds (such as copper), dithiocarbamates, aryloxyphenoxypropionates, neonicotinoids, sulfonylurea, triazoles, and organochlorines predominated due to their frequency of use. Use of toxic-pesticides, lack of personal protection equipment amount others made workers, residents and applicators the toxicological modules with the highest risk of exposure. From the POCER results we found that aquatic organisms, persistence, and groundwater are the modules with the highest ecotoxicological pressure.Research highlights: With the use of the POCER indicator as well as ƩSeq, a more accurate assessment of toxicity and ecotoxicity from certain pesticide can be done instead of the TL equation currently used in Cuba. In addition substitution of the most toxic pesticides by less toxic ones could help to reduce synthetic pesticide pressure on humans and the environment. This study can help to develop policies and management practices to reduce the hazards of synthetic pesticide use in Cuba.
Publisher
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference56 articles.
1. Altenburger R, Arrhenius Å, Backhaus T, Coors A, Faust M, Zitzkat D, 2013. Ecotoxicological combined effects from chemical mixtures (Section IV). Federal Environment Agency (UBA, FKZ 3709 65 404). http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/ecotoxicological-combined-effects-from-chemical
2. Böcker T, Finger R, 2016. European pesticide tax schemes in comparison: An analysis of experiences and developments. Sustainability 8 (378): 1-22.
3. Botião Nerilo S, Andrade Martins F, Botião Nerilo L, Cocco VE, Yoshio Endo R, Oliveira Rocha GH, et al., 2014. Pesticide use and cholinesterase inhibition in small-scale agricultural workers in southern Brazil. Braz J Pharm Sci 50 (4): 10.
4. Bozdogan AM, Yarpuz-Bozdogan N, Tobi I, 2015. Relationship between environmental risk and pesticide application in cereal farming. Int J Environ Res 9 (3): 1047-1054.
5. Burgos Alonso P, 2015. Estudio de estabilidad de plaguicidas en vegetales y frutas Laboratorio de Residuos de Agroquímicos Costa Rica. Revista Pensamiento Actual 15(25): 197-205.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献