Balancing the Needs of Acute and Maintenance Dialysis Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Carson Rachel C.,Forzley Brian,Thomas Sarah,Preto Nina,Hargrove Gaylene,Virani Alice,Antonsen John,Brown Melanie,Copland Michael,Michaud Marie,Singh Anurag,Levin Adeera

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to strain health care systems and drive shortages in medical supplies and equipment around the world. Resource allocation in times of scarcity requires transparent, ethical frameworks to optimize decision making and reduce health care worker and patient distress. The complexity of allocating dialysis resources for both patients receiving acute and maintenance dialysis has not previously been addressed. Using a rapid, collaborative, and iterative process, BC Renal, a provincial network in Canada, engaged patients, doctors, ethicists, administrators, and nurses to develop a framework for addressing system capacity, communication challenges, and allocation decisions. The guiding ethical principles that underpin this framework are (1) maximizing benefits, (2) treating people fairly, (3) prioritizing the worst-off individuals, and (4) procedural justice. Algorithms to support resource allocation and triage of patients were tested using simulations, and the final framework was reviewed and endorsed by members of the provincial nephrology community. The unique aspects of this allocation framework are the consideration of two diverse patient groups who require dialysis (acute and maintenance), and the application of two allocation criteria (urgency and prognosis) to each group in a sequential matrix. We acknowledge the context of the Canadian health care system, and a universal payer in which this framework was developed. The intention is to promote fair decision making and to maintain an equitable reallocation of limited resources for a complex problem during a pandemic.

Publisher

American Society of Nephrology (ASN)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Epidemiology

Reference47 articles.

1. Who Should Receive Life Support During a Public Health Emergency? Using Ethical Principles to Improve Allocation Decisions

2. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19

3. Haunted by the “god committee”: Reciprocity does no justice to eliminating social disparities;Gordon;Am J Bioeth,2004

4. The God Squad and the Origins of Transplantation Ethics and Policy

5. Berlinger N , Wynia M , Powell T , Hester DM , Milliken A , Fabi R , Cohn F , Guidry-Grimes LK , Watson JC , Bruce L , Chuang EJ , Oei G , Abbott J , Jenks NP : Ethical Framework for Health Care Institutions & Guidelines for Institutional Ethics Services Responding to Coronavirus Pandemic. Managing Uncertainty, Safeguarding Communities, Guiding Practice, 2020. Available at: https://www.thehastingscenter.org/ethicalframeworkcovid19/. Accessed December 29, 2020

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3