Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients from SARS-CoV-2–Infected versus Noninfected Deceased Donors

Author:

Yamauchi Junji1ORCID,Azhar Ambreen2,Hall Isaac E.1ORCID,Bhalla Anshul3ORCID,Potluri Vishnu S.4ORCID,Tanriover Bekir5,Gupta Gaurav2ORCID,Imlay Hannah6,Truax Crystal7ORCID,Balaraman Vasanthi3,Raghavan Divya1,Zimmerman Michael8ORCID,Campsen Jeffrey8ORCID,Rofaiel George8ORCID,Baker Talia8,Molnar Miklos Z.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

2. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

7. Department of Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah

8. Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation and Advanced Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

Abstract

Background Acceptable post-transplant outcomes were reported in kidney transplant recipients from donors with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, there are no comparative studies with well-matched controls. Methods This multicenter, prospective observational study, which included three transplant centers in the United States, enrolled 61 kidney recipients from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–infected deceased donors. Using optimal matching methods, we matched every recipient to three comparators receiving kidneys from SARS-CoV-2–negative deceased donors with otherwise highly similar characteristics in the same transplant centers to compare 6-month eGFR. Results Among recipients of SARS-CoV-2–infected donor kidneys, one recipient died with a functional graft within 6 months. Mean 6-month eGFR was not significantly different between SARS-CoV-2–infected and noninfected donor groups (55±21 and 57±25 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively; P = 0.61). Six-month eGFR in recipients from SARS-CoV-2–infected donors who died of reasons other than COVID-19 was not significantly different from those from SARS-CoV-2–negative donors (58±22 and 56±25 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively; P = 0.51). However, recipients from donors who died of COVID-19 had significantly lower 6-month eGFR than those from SARS-CoV-2–negative donors (46±17 and 58±27 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively; P = 0.03). No donor-to-recipient SARS-CoV-2 transmission was observed. Conclusions Six-month eGFR was not significantly different between recipients of kidneys from SARS-CoV-2–infected and noninfected donors. However, those receiving kidneys from donors who died of COVID-19 had significantly lower 6-month eGFR. Donor-to-recipient SARS-CoV-2 transmission was not observed.

Funder

NIH

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Epidemiology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Chronological and Geographical Variations in the Incidence and Acceptance of COVID‐19–Positive Donors and Outcomes Among Abdominal Transplant Patients;Clinical Transplantation;2024-07

2. Kidney Transplantation from SARS-CoV-2–Infected Deceased Donors;Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2023-10-09

3. Should I Take a Transplant Kidney from a Person with COVID Infection?;Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2023-09-22

4. Use of kidneys from SARS-CoV-2 infected donors;Nature Reviews Nephrology;2023-09-21

5. Virologic Studies in COVID-Positive Donors;Current Transplantation Reports;2023-09-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3