Stakeholder Perspectives on Factors Related to Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults Receiving Dialysis

Author:

Hall Rasheeda K.12ORCID,Rutledge Jeanette1ORCID,Lucas Anika12ORCID,Liu Christine K.34,Clair Russell Jennifer St.15,Peter Wendy St.6ORCID,Fish Laura J.78,Colón-Emeric Cathleen12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

2. Medicine Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

3. Section of Geriatric Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

4. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, California

5. Dimensions of Care, LLC, Rockville, Maryland

6. Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota

7. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

8. Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

Background Potentially inappropriate medications, or medications that generally carry more risk of harm than benefit in older adults, are commonly prescribed to older adults receiving dialysis. Deprescribing, a systematic approach to reducing or stopping a medication, is a potential solution to limit potentially inappropriate medications use. Our objective was to identify clinicians and patient perspectives on factors related to deprescribing to inform design of a deprescribing program for dialysis clinics. Methods We conducted rapid qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews and focus groups with clinicians (dialysis clinicians, primary care providers, and pharmacists) and patients (adults receiving hemodialysis aged 65 years or older and those aged 55–64 years who were prefrail or frail) from March 2019 to December 2020. Results We interviewed 76 participants (53 clinicians [eight focus groups and 11 interviews] and 23 patients). Among clinicians, 24 worked in dialysis clinics, 18 worked in primary care, and 11 were pharmacists. Among patients, 13 (56%) were aged 65 years or older, 14 (61%) were Black race, and 16 (70%) reported taking at least one potentially inappropriate medication. We identified four themes (and corresponding subthemes) of contextual factors related to deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications: (1) system-level barriers to deprescribing (limited electronic medical record interoperability, time constraints and competing priorities), (2) undefined comanagement among clinicians (unclear role delineation, clinician caution about prescriber boundaries), (3) limited knowledge about potentially inappropriate medications (knowledge limitations among clinicians and patients), and (4) patients prioritize symptom control over potential harm (clinicians expect resistance to deprescribing, patient weigh risks and benefits). Conclusions Challenges to integration of deprescribing into dialysis clinics included siloed health systems, time constraints, comanagement behaviors, and clinician and patient knowledge and attitudes toward deprescribing.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

American Society of Nephrology

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Epidemiology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3