Fluid Management for Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy

Author:

Ledoux-Hutchinson Lawrence1ORCID,Wald Ron2,Malbrain Manu L.N.G.345ORCID,Carrier François Martin16ORCID,Bagshaw Sean M.7,Bellomo Rinaldo89,Adhikari Neill K.J.10ORCID,Gallagher Martin11,Silver Samuel A.12ORCID,Bouchard Josée13ORCID,Connor Jr Michael J.14,Clark Edward G.15ORCID,Côté Jean-Maxime116,Neyra Javier A.17,Denault André18,Beaubien-Souligny William116ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

2. Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

4. Medical Data Management, Medaman, Geel, Belgium

5. International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium

6. Critical Care Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

7. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

8. Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

9. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

10. Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

11. Renal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

12. Division of Nephrology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

13. Division of Nephrology, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

14. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

15. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Anesthesiology, Montreal Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

16. Service of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

17. Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

18. Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

Background In critically ill patients receiving KRT, high ultrafiltration rates and persistent fluid accumulation are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this international survey was to evaluate current practices and evidence gaps related to fluid removal with KRT in critically ill patients. Methods This was a multinational, web-based survey distributed by seven networks comprising nephrologists and intensivists. Physicians involved in the care of critically ill patients were invited to complete a 39-question survey about fluid management practices on KRT. The survey was distributed from September 2021 to December 2021. Results There were 757 respondents from 96 countries (response rate of 65%). Most respondents practiced adult medicine (89%) and worked in an academic center (69%). The majority (91%) reported aiming for a 0.5- to 2-L negative fluid balance per day when fluid removal is indicated, although there was important variability in what respondents considered a safe maximal target. Intensivists were more likely than nephrologists to use adjunct volume status assessment methods (i.e., ultrasound, hemodynamic markers, and intra-abdominal pressure), while nephrologists were more likely to deploy cointerventions aimed at improving tolerance to fluid removal (i.e., osmotic agents and low-temperature dialysate). There was a broad consensus that rapid decongestion should be prioritized when fluid accumulation is present, but the prevention of hypotension was also reported as a competing priority. A majority (77%) agreed that performing trials that compare fluid management strategies would be ethical and clinically relevant. Conclusions We have identified multiple areas of variability in current practice of fluid management for patients receiving KRT. Most nephrologists and intensivists agreed that several knowledge gaps related to fluid removal strategies should be investigated in future randomized controlled trials.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3