U.S. Missile Defense: from National Territory Protection to NATO Defense

Author:

Klimov V.1ORCID,Oznobishchev S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Abstract

The 1972 ABM Treaty between the USSR and the USA allowed for the deployment of a limited strategic missile defense system, but established a strict ban on the deployment of anti-missile systems outside their national territory. The agreement was the first turn in the U.S. policy in this area, determining the direction and content of missile defense development programs for many years to come. Once every ten years, the United States revised its policy, for instance, R. Reagan’s intention in 1983 to build a large-scale space-based missile defense system was seen as an attempt to move away from the concept of mutual nuclear deterrence, enshrined in the ABM Treaty. However, only after its withdrawal from the ABM Treaty in 2002, the United States set a course for the deployment of a missile defense system in Europe, as stated, to protect the region from nuclear missile threats from “rogue states”. At the present stage, the growing degradation of relations between Russia and Western countries, especially against the backdrop of hostilities in Ukraine, has led NATO states to put forward new approaches to the integration of missile defense and air defense systems, providing for the functional interface of information management systems and strike components for the successful interception of different classes of targets. The experience of providing Ukraine with integrated defense and its functioning on the basis of modern Western air defense systems will allow the U.S. / NATO to evaluate the effectiveness of the chosen approach and apply the knowledge gained to improve Europe’s “anti-missile umbrella”. The article proposes the author’s periodization of American policy in the field of missile defense, as well as considers each of the identified stages with special emphasis on the last one, which is directly related to the current political situation.

Publisher

Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics

Reference13 articles.

1. Dobrynin A.F. In Confidence. Ambassador in Washington under six US Presidents (1962–1986). Moscow, Author, 1996. 687 p. (In Russ.)

2. Abrahamson А., Cooper F. What Did We Get for Our $30-Billion Investment in SDI/BMD? National Institute for Public Policy, September 1993. Available at: https://highfrontier.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/What-for-30B_.pdf (accessed 10.07.2023).

3. DeGrasse R., Daggett S. An Economic Analysis of the President’s Strategic Defense Initiative: Costs and Cost Exchange Ratios. Current News, 03.01.1985, Special Edition, no. 1243, pp. 35-46.

4. Arbatov A.G. 20 days later. Pravda, 20.11.1986. (In Russ.)

5. Brown N.C. The Strategic Defense Initiative and European Security. A Conference Report. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation, January 1986. 44 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3