Radiosurgical interventions in the prevention of post-resection liver failure
-
Published:2023-03-19
Issue:1
Volume:28
Page:25-32
-
ISSN:2408-9524
-
Container-title:Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Ann. hir. gepatol.
Author:
Melekhina O. V.1ORCID, Musatov A. B.1ORCID, Kulezneva J. V.1ORCID, Efanov M. G.1ORCID, Tsvirkun V. V.1ORCID, Alikhanov R. B.1ORCID, Amkhadov E. O.1ORCID, Sadykov B. A.1ORCID, Kantimerov D. F.1ORCID, Salnikov K. K.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous ALPPS as a method for preventing post-resection liver failure.Materials and methods. The methodology involved a retrospective study of the results of portovenous embolization and percutaneous radiofrequency assisted liver partition with portal vein embolization (PRALLPS), in case of the future liver volume <40% . The degree of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant and its rate were assessed in two groups. Complications of manipulation and frequency of postresection hepatic failure were studied.Results. In the first stage, portenous embolization was successfully performed in 38 patients and PRALLPS was successfully performed in 47 patients. In the second stage, liver resection was performed in 27 (71.1%) and 33 (70%) patients. The most frequent complication of PRALLPS was bile accumulation in the radiofrequency ablation area (13.1%). The incidence of other complications of the first stage did not differ between groups. No differences in blood loss or incidence of liver failure were reported after the second stage. No fatal outcomes reported. The mean degree of hypertrophy and growth did not differ between the groups. The mean time of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant after percutaneous radiofrequency assisted partition of the parenchyma with portal vein embolization and portenous embolization was 13 ± 5 and 18 ± 7 days (p = 0.008).Conclusion. The results of percutaneous radiofrequency assisted liver partition with portal vein embolization are comparable in terms of safety with those of portenous embolization. Radiofrequency partition of the parenchyma with portal vein embolization enables optimal hypertrophy of the future liver remnant to be achieved faster.
Publisher
Annals of Surgical Hepatology
Subject
Gastroenterology,Hepatology,Surgery
Reference18 articles.
1. Shoup M.,. Gonen M., D'Angelica M., Jarnagin W.R., DeMatteo R.P., Schwartz L.H., Tuorto S., Blumgart L.H., Fong Y., Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection., J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;7(3):325-30. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00370-0. 2. Imamura H., Shimada R., Kubota M., Matsuyama Y., Nakayama A., Miyagawa S., Makuuchi M., Kawasaki S., Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients., Hepatology. 1999 Apr;29(4):1099-105. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290415.. 3. Lang H., Baumgart J., Mittler J., Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) Registry: What Have We Learned?, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany/2019//doi.org/10.5009/gnl19233 4. Chan A., Zhang W.Y., Chok K., Dai J., Ji R., Kwan C., Man N., Poon R., Lo C.M., ALPPS Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hepatitis-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Changing Paradigm in Modulation of Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy., Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):957-965. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003433. 5. Azoulay D., Castaing D., Smail A., Adam R., Cailliez V., Laurent A., Lemoine A., Bismuth H., Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization., Ann Surg. 2000 Apr;231(4):480-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200004000-00005.
|
|